MacBook Pro retina 13 2013 or MacBook Air 13 2015?

Question

macbook

Hello. This is my first time purchasing an apple device, so I need your help. Both options seem tempting to me, but each has its own pros. Air has more autonomy, retina has a better screen, respectively. The next question is, is there such a big difference in the screens? And how long does this MacBook Pro retina 13 2013 hold a charge? I would be very grateful for reasoned answers

Answer 1

My opinion is a bug. First, the headroom and performance will provide it with many more years of support for future updates. Secondly, the retina and the usual air screen simply cannot be compared, this is heaven and earth. At the office The site shows statistics on how long the battery of each laptop lives, the difference is 2 hours, this difference has been approximately the same for all years of production since the time when the retina appeared. If 2 hours (10 versus 12) is not fatal for you, the price tag suits you, and the extra 200 grams will not weigh down your hand, then definitely a mistake.

Answer 2

The difference in screens is very significant. The battery is easy to change, it usually costs somewhere around $ 50-60, on a bush laptop it may make sense to change.

Answer 3

Yesterday I held a MacBook Pro 13 with a retina in my hands. I have the same one without a retina.
The difference is colossal. Highly. The image is much clearer and more pleasing to the eye.
If you need it just for surfing and as a typewriter, then definitely it.
If for some specific working purposes, then it is better to build on iron.

Answer 4

you would at least write the models more precisely, we would have looked at the iron .. otherwise the top air 15 and the low model of 13 are not comme il fou compared. the proshka will only pull out the retina ...
and so choose for yourself for what tasks you need a macbook.
retina is definitely cooler

Answer 5

Both are in the basic configuration, needed for programming, the Internet and sometimes movies