M
M
MrSteve2011-05-16 19:46:44
Audio
MrSteve, 2011-05-16 19:46:44

Legal aspects of electronic music

Hello. As a true electronic music lover, I was interested in the following:

  1. If one DJ creates a track and another remixes it, then who owns the rights to the remix and is it necessary to conclude an agreement to create it?
  2. If a DJ plays a track created by another DJ in his set, does this use need to be legalized somehow?


Thank you in advance for your help.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

5 answer(s)
G
GaJetFan, 2011-05-16
@GaJetFan

So here the moment is this - what the DJ does is not covered by copyright.
An excerpt from an article on the DJ.ru website: A
DJ, being a subject of related rights, has property and non-property rights.
Non-property rights include:
Require recognition as the performer of the work.
Require that his name or pseudonym be given each time his work is played.
Prohibit modification of your work.
The property rights of a DJ include:
Permission or prohibition to use his work by other persons.
Decide how many copies of his work will be distributed.
In general, I advise you to read the full article:www.dj.ru/articles/interview/document277420.phtml

G
GaJetFan, 2011-05-16
@GaJetFan

Yes, and specific answers to your questions:
1) If a DJ created a remix, then the copyright does not belong to him, but to the author of the original song, so you can do the remix again.
2) if the DJ created the track himself and from scratch, then he can claim authorship. so it is necessary to communicate with this very DJ.

A
artyomst, 2011-05-16
@artyomst

a DJ is a person, roughly speaking, who turns on Winamp and inserts tracks there, he does not have to be a musician and does not have to be able to “create” tracks. His task is to find and turn on the music

A
almazmusic, 2011-05-17
@almazmusic

The DJ plays, not writes. Written by a producer or musician.
As for remixes, everything is simple:
1) if the remix is ​​not included in the official collection, then it is considered a bootleg remix
2) if it is included in the official collection, then the rights belong to the label, if the contract is signed on exclusive rights and belongs to the author of the remix, if on non-exclusive
And if write remix and start demanding something, then the state has the right to ask you at least some kind of state of emergency, tk. you are cutting loot here, and it flows past all the well-known wallets on all the well-known islands. We need to share with the government. So be careful.
As for the game, everything is also very simple:
1) if you play in a club - in general, you don’t owe anything to anyone, discs wear out and therefore are overwritten
2) if you publish a disc, then there are two options:
a) kosher option: the publisher does not write the tracklist on the disc and the business (as an example, promotional discs);
b) honest: the publisher contacts each of the authors or those who own the rights to the tracks, concludes with each of them an agreement that is beneficial for the copyright holders for each track with all sorts of percentages from sales or a fix. amount.
In my opinion everything. It seems to be something like this in general terms.

S
sildc, 2011-05-17
@sildc

1) Rights are divided equally, unless otherwise stated.
2) Theoretically necessary: ​​it is necessary to have the rights to public reproduction of each track. In practice, as a rule, it is ignored, but in our country everything is possible:
www.zvuki.ru/R/P/20445
habrahabr.ru/blogs/copyright/63217/

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question