I
I
Ivan Zhukov2015-04-07 16:28:33
Asterisk
Ivan Zhukov, 2015-04-07 16:28:33

Is there a high reliability build of Asterisk?

Which version or build of Asterisk is the most fault tolerant and stable under high load?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

5 answer(s)
M
Mikhail Lyalin, 2015-04-07
@mr_jok

freepbx

S
Sergey, 2015-04-07
@serzik

rather than Asterisk, it will be FreeSwitch - it was designed just for a heavy load

I
Igor Goncharovsky, 2015-04-15
@IgorG

For the requirements of the greatest reliability, you should choose:
1) The longest supported LTS branch of asterisk at the moment
2) When installing Asterisk, disable all unnecessary modules
3) Provide sufficient resources (network, processor memory) - there is no universal recipe here
The rest depends on the functionality that you need to implement it on asterisk - just a wrongly written dialplan can already ruin any stability.

D
Dmitry Luponos, 2015-04-12
@Bessome

From experience, asterisk is reliable. But as for the machine on which it is launched, I derived the following requirements for myself:
1) 2 GB of RAM (provided MySQL + Asterisk)
2) 2 processor cores (not critical)
3) high-quality Internet channel - for a normal system - stability , for highly loaded additional requirement is the channel width.

S
sillusi0nsx, 2015-04-16
@sillusi0nsx

In the Elastix distribution, the Asterisk build has always been highly reliable and stable. According to experience, ~ 20 thousand incoming per hour holds without problems, on the server ~ = core-i3 / 8Gb

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question