Html/css + flexbox or bootstrap4 for customer?

Question

Layout

Bootstrap 4 or html/css + flexbox? I'm asking as a customer.
It is necessary that in the future, third-party developers can understand the code, and accordingly support or modify it.

Answer 1

All of these terms go hand in hand with each other.
The bootstrap itself, as a framework, is completely built on html + css + js, including flexbox (grid).

Answer 2

1st option: Html/css + flexbox
(bootstrap is an abstraction)

Answer 3

It doesn't matter, in the future you can find a developer who prefers one of the two and will be able to figure it out. It also makes no difference whether it will be possible to support this in the future, you can nagovnokodit for everyone.

Answer 4

If good layout designers who can adequately form the class structure - then option 1, otherwise option 2.
In my practice, I have never met the standards of layout designers (who at least know what BEM is), so I think the choice is obvious)

Answer 5

bootstrap for sure.
The cost of owning a site is sometimes tens of times more or even hundreds than the development itself.
Bootstrap allows you to reduce it.
Yes, 1 option is obtained and faster, and if the hands are not out of .. then the quality is also not bad.
But bootstrap allows you to
1. not even know about the thousands of small jambs that you forgot during your own layout.
2. The cost of ownership rises because the bootstrap can also be trained by a monkey, in particular a manager and a content manager, but flexes are definitely a workbench for any edits.
3. Standardization of projects has always led to an increase in volumes and in proportion to the increase in code.
there would be no such balance, everyone would write in binary code, until now.
And what is as fast as possible, but the market requires an increase in volumes for this NET ... :)
And this despite the fact that I admit that 4 bootstrap took a step in the wrong direction.

Answer 6

For a new project, I would choose css grid if the audience allows.