Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
HSRP on both sides of the tunnel?
I want to combine 2 offices using a gre-tunnel between cisco routers. In both offices, the provider gives /30, i.e. it is given to me at the first office 1.2.3.6 with the gateway 1.2.3.5, 2.2.3.6 with the gateway 2.2.3.5 in the second. I want to put on both sides 2 881 ciscos, in which the address 1.2.3.6 and 2.2.3.6 is reserved using HSRP. At the first office, I hang addresses on the interfaces: 1.2.3.1, 1.2.3.2, in HSRP I say 1.2.3.6 - common. In the second, respectively: 2.2.3.1, 2.2.3.2, in HSRP 2.2.3.6 - general. With this configuration, cats initiate a connection from an invalid address for the provider 1.2.3.1 (2.2.3.1) and do not see each other, while safely responding to the HSRP address if the request comes from any other host on the Internet.
cisco1
interface FastEthernet4
ip address 1.2.3.1 255.255.255.248
standby 20 ip 1.2.3.6
interface Tunnel10
ip unnumbered FastEthernet4
tunnel source 1.2.3.6
tunnel destination 2.2.3.6
interface FastEthernet4
ip address 2.2.3.1 255.255.255.248
standby 20 ip 2.2.3.6
interface Tunnel10
ip unnumbered FastEthernet4 tunnel
destination
2.2.3.2
.3.6
How can this be overcome?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Well, I will answer myself. The problem was not that the tunnel was not working, but that no traffic was running inside it. everything was decided by replacing ip unnumbered FastEthernet4
on ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
one side, and ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
on the other
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question