Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
How to defeat bugs in IP video surveillance?
Hi, All...
The story is this - there is a "smart" camera OMNY 200 PRO , I assume that this is some kind of branded Chinese (which one, I have not been able to understand yet). Now there are 6 such cameras. Then the fun begins - there is a machine with a Core i7-4790K, 8GB RAM, an SSD for the system and 1TB for the archive. Now this machine is Windows. Now I will tell you what I tried and what came of it.
1) Ivideon
There are no cameras in the lists, but it works. But it works crookedly. If TCP - cameras regularly fall off. Many events are not recorded in the archive - this is not acceptable. If UDP - then when moving in the frame in 90% of cases, a moving object will be followed by a trail of artifacts (pixels). Otherwise, it works well, software motion detection works perfectly, it is written without loss. Loading proca approximately from 24% to 30%.
2) Macroscope (demo version)
I like everything, everything is fine, there are no glitches like in Ivideon. There is only one problem - 6 cameras load percent into the shelf. So far, the developers cannot understand why. Sent logs to them - did not save.
The rest of the zoo also tried everything, and AxxonNext, and everything else - I don’t like it. The question is - what am I doing wrong, is it really so difficult in 2015 to assemble a normal video surveillance system that would just work ???!!!
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Well, firstly, these are not the worst cameras. Secondly, most of the cameras now are China.
Next - you have a problem in planning.
- Is your machine with Core i7-4790K, 8GB RAM, etc., a dedicated video server, or will you be watching on it?
- In order not to slow down the percentage, you need to configure the receipt of 2 streams from the cameras and the operation of the built-in motion detector.
- 1TB disk for the archive is very small. On 6 cameras in FullHD 4Mbps, its stream is enough for half a day.
Summarizing, I can say that both Macroscop and AxxonNext can cope with such a config and should not slow down.
Perhaps you should have initially considered buying an NVR instead of a PC-based video server.
It would be both cheaper and easier to set up.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question