How ethical is it to go to interviews if there is no goal of finding a job?

Question

Career in IT

I know that many go to interviews in order to “probe” the market, identify weaknesses in their preparation, and so on.
But how ethical is it to go to interviews if there is no goal of finding a job (from the point of view that a person is wasting time (which is money) for a company that is really looking for an employee)? Is this fraught with the fact that employers will "reveal" the essence of my behavior, put unreliable applicants on a blacklist, and then it will be impossible to find a job at all?

Answer 1

walk more and more.
if there are many like you, then the market should evolve in response. because employers will need to streamline this process:
= spend less time
= if there are a lot of rejections, then maybe raise the salary
it's like asking " should I go on dates with many girls to get to know them better if I don't want to get married yet? or should I go ?" Only date if you're ready?" I mean dating without sex (only acquaintance), because with sex it's another question "is it ethical to get an interview, get a job, gain confidence and merge all their code in the first days and disappear ...?".

Answer 2

How ethical is competitive intelligence, you say?!)))
She does not know such a concept!

Answer 3

Your reasoning, yes, to instill in employers ...
From fresh:
https://hh.ru/vacancy/19557940
At the very beginning:
"We are looking for active, proactive, responsible employees, and not plankton, which turns off at 18:00 computer and goes on a "well-deserved rest" "
I.e. the employer quite calmly switches to insults in relation to those who work according to the labor code of the Russian Federation (arrived on time, left on time). This is just enchanting arrogance and rudeness.

Answer 4

Employers do this exactly and often, I have never seen it. So it's a double-edged sword when it comes to ethics.

Answer 5

What happens if you go to a clothing store, try on a couple of clothes and buy nothing? =)

Answer 6

As an employer, I say - not only is it ethical, but also useful for those who interview you. Just like you probe the market, the employer notes who has applied for his job, even if he does not hire this candidate. For example, this is how the required salary level is found out (when there are too many responses, then the salary is too high, or if the average level of candidates is lower than required, the salary may be underestimated). Such empty interviews help you write ads correctly, learn how to select candidates before an interview, and all that.

Answer 7

absolutely ethical, no one bothers you at the interview to convince you to change jobs.
the shortage of personnel is so wild that the appearance of a blacklist will simply simply raise salaries by 10% -100% for employees, I think not a single company is globally ready for this

Answer 8

How to have fun is your personal decision, if you want to cross-stitch, if you want to go to interviews
There is nothing unethical about being interested in vacancies. Even if you do not set the goal of finding a job, it is enough to assume the occurrence of two extreme situations:
1. You are interviewing in an office where working conditions are disproportionately better than those that you have. I think you have to be an idiot to refuse.
2. The management of the office understands that you are the "super specialist" who will raise them to another level and offer you a job on any of your conditions.
The job of a good HR manager is like that of a hunter. You need to have a flair for good shots and do everything to get them. He does not wait for someone to come to him on an ad, he himself searches for competing firms and offers more favorable conditions. True, 99.9% of HR managers are brainless girls / boys arranged by pull.
The HR manager you're talking to will get paid whether you show up for an interview or not, so you're not wasting anyone's time or money.

Answer 9

Max Pushkarev , you are mixing "ethical" and "dangerous" in the question.
About ethical, as they wrote above, a matter of personal conscience, but about "discover" - probably not, at least there was no information about such a "black list"

Answer 10

I often did it myself, passed tests at an interview and found out what knowledge needs to be improved

Answer 11

If we talk about ethics, then attending interviews cannot be unethical. Deception is unethical. In other words, if you want to be ethical, say at the interview that right now you are not looking for a job, but are only looking at employers and want to better understand your strengths and weaknesses. This is fine.
Professional HR will still interview you. If you represent at least some potential interest for them, you will be included in the database of candidates and will maintain good relations with you. Either way, you'll at least get what you came for.
Non-professional HR can end the interview at this point. However, in this case, you will not waste time, and the employer will appreciate your honesty.
If you lie that you want to get a job without having such an intention, this is fraught with the deterioration of karma. In a number of cities, there are HR communities where information about inadequate applicants quickly spreads. You can really start to refuse an interview without explanation, and they will be right.

Answer 12

Of course, it is not very decent to waste the time of business people. But the way HR sometimes relates to the search for candidates (for example, without reading a resume, they make you go through the whole city, and then like, oh, sorry, you are a programmer, but we need a carpenter), then you can take some revenge :)
Only here at interviews You will not recognize your failures in real knowledge, the ability to imagine yourself works here. This is also useful, but slightly off the mark. Those. it will be useful to walk around when you want to know what is going on in the market in general and perhaps find a better position.