A
A
Alexander Shapovalov2013-04-24 07:12:30
Automation
Alexander Shapovalov, 2013-04-24 07:12:30

How do you feel about systems for automatically evaluating the quality and cost of websites?

I would like to know the opinion of habravchans regarding the assessment of the quality and cost of websites using automatic systems, for example, such as: cys.ru :
7162f2b11c0b4ad1a1e53354dfdcee81.jpg
or mysitecost.ru :
4131aa4b9f901091986cff78aaf1a07f.jpg
or bizinformatsiya.ru :
ecae0c05cfa09282d0c035dd589bb083.jpg
Should we trust such an assessment? And do you use similar systems when buying sites to find out their cost?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

5 answer(s)
E
ertaquo, 2013-04-24
@shapovalov_org

This assessment should not be trusted. My site of two lines is estimated by the last two systems at $ 583 and 8,314.38 rubles , respectively.

A
Anton Agaltsov, 2013-04-24
@Archusha

If the price offered by the system suits me, then I will be positive.
If not satisfied, I will be negative.
When I bought sites, I often used system data to bring down the price. When selling, marketers hired "experts" to independently evaluate the site (usually a studio).

A
Artur Smirnov, 2013-04-24
@wisd

Strangely I enter the site and the answer is “Unfortunately, it is impossible to open the document now.”
Do such analyzers not analyze all sites?

A
anitspam, 2013-04-25
@anitspam

definitely worth "trusting" the service, which says that habr has 66 views and 22 visits per day.

B
Boris Syomov, 2013-04-26
@kotomyava

How can you trust a tool that builds an assessment on it is not clear who, how, and why criteria are chosen? =)
How much does a fancy online store cost on a new domain with zero traffic? How much does a personal blog cost on some constructor after a surge in traffic? =) I.t.p. These are not tools - this is nonsense.
I checked - but shitty blog is more expensive.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question