B
B
beginner882015-07-16 19:37:16
Intel
beginner88, 2015-07-16 19:37:16

H97chipset raid 1 what about Trim?

we have a "budget" win2012 server on the H97 chipset, under SQL1c the
ssd samsung 850pro screws are raised on
5dc15b15645649b4baeefe87d86381c9.jpg
it raid 10/1,
the latest Intel® 13.6 . What is the best way to solve this problem within reasonable and budgetary limits? there is exactly the same configuration on raid 0, everything is successful! as I understand it, the driver simply does not support RAID 10.1 processing, rubanul indexing and defragmentation, the speed is still normal, but I don’t want to kill disks with this method. Or am I stressing for nothing? You can buy a controller for this desktop motherboard, unless of course there are compatibility problems.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

3 answer(s)
P
Puma Thailand, 2015-07-16
@opium

In general, using under-raids on motherboards is kind of stupid, make a soft raid and live in peace without a vendor lock.

B
beginner88, 2015-07-17
@beginner88

and what will orthodox disks from itel give? if the controller itself does not support trim in raids 1.10
, why is the same samsung bad? Aphids only in terms of the built-in garbage collector?
I understood about the resource, it means only speed
Soft raid - a drop in speed and is it worth contacting it, for these tasks
Raid 1 - Trim also does not work, as in 10m, checked
Raid 0 - as a way out of the situation, but you will have to backup more often and always be afraid!
I understand that initially the approach to this server did not work out, so I’ll forgive the help, I won’t be able to replace everything, but there is a possibility to fix something

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question