Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Freekassa - take a risk or not?
Situation - you need a temporary solution to accept payments on the site (for a maximum of a year). IP and all that. The only aggregator for working with individuals that we found is freekassa. Looks very suspicious starting from a site on http. Reviews on forums, VK, etc. are all as one deeply negative.
In general - who worked, share your impressions, pzhlst.
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
There is https, just no forced redirect.
And yes, this is indicative of how reliable it is, given that there is let's encrypt and now even shitty sites can be done with https.
Do you often write reviews if everything is fine with you? But when everything is bad, everyone runs to write wherever possible.
And even if 99% work there without problems, the remaining 1% will write shit.
In general, robokassa qiwi/webmoney/yandex/paypal/payment wall all work with physicists within reasonable limits.
What is the risk?
Do you have a payment of at least a million? And then the loss of even one payment is critical.
If the payments are 10 rubles each, then the maximum that you will lose is a couple of hundred rubles, and then you will realize that it was not worth dealing with.
Or decide what's worth.
Is it not worth a couple of hundred rubles to take a chance?
No matter how satisfied a person is, almost no one writes positive reviews.
Psychology.
Fricassie is used for HYIP projects.
For serious people don't take it.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question