A
A
Anton Popov2012-01-11 19:01:38
Solid State Drives
Anton Popov, 2012-01-11 19:01:38

ext4 vs btrfs for ssd?

I bought an SSD drive, I'm going to install Linux Mint. The question arose: which file system to choose?
The /home partition will most likely be on the hdd. There will be no swap (12Gb ddr2). The main purpose of the computer is webdev.
There are opinions that btrfs is more sharpened for ssd drives of their box, although ext4 can be finished for ssd the same. For example, this article describes a method: habrahabr.ru/blogs/linux/129551/ , but the author does not seem to have experimented with btrfs.
While I'm leaning towards btrfs, what can you tell me, dear habra community?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

4 answer(s)
V
Vlad Zhivotnev, 2012-01-11
@inkvizitor68sl

My btrfs fell apart 2 times. It was, however, around 10.10 (in fact, since then she has been quietly on that laptop and lives with ext4).
At the same time, it fell apart beautifully - tune2fs / mount on fs made a panic in any Linux.
And yes - faster =)

A
alienrom, 2012-01-11
@alienrom

For flash drives, it seems like there are specialized file systems. I can’t say right off the bat, because I don’t use an SSD

I
Ilya Zelikin, 2012-06-06
@zilia

If you take frills like unfinished btrfs, then maybe you should try ZFS . I don’t really know how it is with speed and friendship with SSD, but from a comparison in practice, IMHO, a good topic would turn out.

K
kyb, 2016-03-14
@kyb

F2FS is designed specifically for flash drives, incl. SSD. According to tests found on the net, it proved to be the most productive, (it is followed by XFS, then Ext4). But I myself am looking for a solution: which is better ?

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question