Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Does it make sense to make single-level urls?
It is possible to make the most "flat" url structure on the site.
For example, instead of:
http://example.com/kino
http://example.com/politika
http://example.com/ecomonika
http://example.com/kino/operacia-i
http://example.com/politika/trump-obosralsya-na-publike
http://example.com/ecomonika/bitcoin-stoit-million
http://example.com/kino
http://example.com/politika
http://example.com/ecomonika
http://example.com/operacia-i
http://example.com/trump-obosralsya-na-publike
http://example.com/bitcoin-stoit-million
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
It seems like it’s better to have a structure than everything in one pile, at least in any metrics it’s more convenient to look at the structures, so it’s clear which modules are popular, which subsections (sections of news / articles) and which documents are in them
No, it doesn't make sense to do so. Yandex uses your url structure when indexing, and a slightly shorter url will not give any tangible benefit in ranking.
There is no point in doing a single-level url. On the contrary, it will only worsen your positions in the search.
In addition, sections need to be created under a pre-compiled semantic core. First, we create the core, build a hierarchy in it, and on the basis of this hierarchy we create sections and subsections on the site.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question