Are there adequate storage services (clouds) for storing backups?

Question

Backup

Hello

, I have a total of 50TB of data, when their volume grows to 150TB, you must either:
a) change the host because he does not have offers for hosting above 150TB. Do you have any hostings in mind that have a solution larger than 150TB
b) look for a storage service at a reasonable price, so AWS, Google, Microsoft S3 solutions go to the forest (on hosting we pay 260 USD for 150TB. Is there a similar solution c
) to collect storage from 4 ceph servers - it disappears because the price of such storage grows 4 times, it also disappears to collect something like raid0 at the expense of glaster, fuse is very slow, we know we tried it.
d) your suggestions?

Thanks

Answer 1

AWS S3 Glacier has already been mentioned. To estimate the cost, you must estimate how often and with what urgency you need to restore data.
The cost of storage is small - $0.4/month/TB, and the "download" of data is free.
But uploading (restoring) is paid - from $0.0025 ( 5–12 hours) to $0.03 per GB, plus for API calls.
https://aws.amazon.com/glacier/pricing/
So only you can count.
It's one thing if it's only important to save for a "rainy day", and quite another - if every month you need to restore a couple of terabytes.

Answer 2

Amazon Glacier has an unreasonable price?! It seems that everything is really bad with your finances (or with the organization of backups) ... maybe, well, then?

Answer 3

If you are satisfied with the current hoster, connect another tariff or two from him. You do not have 1 copy of the file stored, spread it "according to tariffs". Or, for example, you will store fresh backups on one, and old backups on the other.

Answer 4

Amazon glacier .
It's for backups.
Of the cloud the cheapest.
Price tag 260 USD for 150TB this is already on the verge - for this price there will be no redundancy, calculate it yourself.
And cloud storage without redundancy will not work.

your suggestions?

And it strongly depends on what you back up and what requirements.
For example, I often use a scheme with a regular file storage without redundancy and additionally Glacier.
It takes a long and expensive time to collect data from a glacier, but the reliability is higher, and if you need it quickly, there is a local storage.

Answer 5

As always, their prices are the lowest, and the rates are delicious
https://ru.hetzner.com/hosting/produktmatrix/stora...
Remove another 20% VAT from the price, they will return

Answer 6

Backblaze B2