Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Alternative to WordStat Yandex? What to use?
I want to expand the LF and MF queries for existing pages
I know about the existence
of 3 alternatives to WordStat Yandex (I used to think that it would be enough, now I understand that it is not quite complete and that it does not give the lion's share of LF and MF queries and tails)
I want to ask you so as not to waste time understanding each program and service, what are the pros and cons and what other alternatives to WordStat Yandex are there?
If you have experience or understanding of the situation, name the main pros and cons of these programs and services.
1. Postukhov databases
2. MOAB database of keywords
3. KEY Collector
I’m also waiting for your recommendations on how to expand the core and track positions, the essence is simple; I work in an online video surveillance store; there are + 100,500 products of the main subject and related products, mainly China (no brand). The main Seo indicators brought the traffic back to normal is not growing;
Therefore, I want to make this core a full-fledged one and select only transactional queries. But there is no tool that will help better.
I wanted to go to Semyon Vigorous, but they want everything there at once, but I need to go through the sections gradually
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
The more complete the semantics is initially collected, the more correctly the distribution of key phrases on the site goes, in the kernel you were rightly told.
Keycollector in my opinion is the most useful program for collecting semantics, expanding and cleaning the core. Moab is recommended by many, but I have never used it, I don’t know. In my opinion, it is always more useful to collect data yourself than to use other people's databases. I also recommend that you use the data from Yandex Metrics for key phrases, select the most transactional ones (if the goals have already been set) and, based on this information, optimize the pages
I use KEY Collector and I have enough with my head. parsing tools in QC are as follows:
For my projects, this data is enough. You can also download the keys of competitors from the promoter.
Try also our Bukvarix program (can be downloaded from our website www.bukvarix.com/download.html ). This is a base with a control shell, it can be considered as a free alternative to the base of Maxim Pastukhov and MOAB.
There are 1 billion 323 million key phrases in the Bookvarix database, frequencies have been requested for all phrases, the database was last updated last week, January 11, 2016.
With the help of Bookvarix, you can very quickly select key phrases, filter out non-target meanings of words, and then refine the selection (request the indicators you need for analysis, group, etc.) using the Key Collector.
1. Pastukhov databases - price in direct, fast, online version, foreign keywords, no regional frequency
2. MOAB database of keywords - expensive, no price in direct, keywords from metrics
3. KEY Collector - slow, and dreary in the setting, you still need to buy a proxy monthly, but without it there is no way
4. Bookvarix - I constantly use, more phrases than in the Pastukhov Base and they are more meaningful, regional frequency.
You can parse competitors - prices, products, all URLs - it will be clear what keywords they use to promote
Correctly said above, be sure to look at what requests were clicked earlier. You have Metrika and Analytics attached (+ their own webmaster tools).
I’ll add more seranking for search queries. It has a collection of requests for Yandex.wordstat and for the internal database seranking.ru/features.keyword-suggestion.html. That's just the internal database and will help you find low frequencies, which the wordstat will not show.
I’m talking about it first of all because you still want to track positions, it will just be possible to do it there. And it will be convenient to add requests immediately to the project for subsequent monitoring of positions.
Well, in the same place you can do an analysis of the site and a whole lot more, a lot of useful tools.
The only negative is that everything is paid)) although relatively inexpensive.
The quality of the base could not be determined, because. started to work on a turnkey basis, i.e. with the selection of semantics and setting up contextual advertising at the SU-30 tariff.
And very in vain!
After payment, an advance payment of 50% - 30,000 rubles turned out to be * no one needs. To the question a month and a half later, "what has been done and what's next?", they billed the remaining 50% and filled the company in Ya.Direct even by half that did not meet the agreed one. They only called once in a few months after payment. The whole attitude towards the client comes down to avoiding relations with him - like, you paid yourself, sort it out yourself.
To the question-claim to the leader Iserson "what is happening with my project, what should I do with it and why are things being done like this?"
As a result, I consider MOAB a scam.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question