4K monitor. Is 32 inches much worse than 27?

Question

Monitors

I choose a monitor (3840 × 2160, IPS) so as not to degrade the picture quality as much as possible after my iMac 4.5K m1 24'' (which I want to change to a PC), but at the same time a larger size.
I once tried 1440p IPS 27'' and, damn it, I can see every pixel on it. Just a concrete deterioration after retina. Sitting like this is already unpleasant. So I started looking at 4K.

So. What is the ideal resolution for 4K? I would like, of course, 32 inches, so that it would be more pleasant to watch and play movies, but will there be a lower pixel density there than on a 27 monitor or not? Maybe someone here has personal experience.

Answer 1

I once tried 1440p IPS 27'' and, damn it, I can see every pixel on it.

You should at least sit for a week to get out of the habit of high pipiai.
Another 27 "2k ppi - 109, and 32" 4k ppi - 140. So this is not an equivalent situation.

to make it more enjoyable to watch and play movies

You can also look at ultrawide monitors (21:9). At the most such - I recommend.