4K-5K Designer Monitor - Does it Make Sense?

Question

Monitors

Hello, I decided to change my two 24" to one 27" and the question arose about 4K monitors.
First of all, I'm concerned about the convenience of moving the cursor around the screen with a resolution of 3840x2160 - in my opinion this is very inconvenient.
The monitor will be used 100% for work - design, interfaces, office tasks.
Who has experience with using such monitors, please tell me whether it makes sense to take 4K, or take the usual 27 "with a resolution of 2560 x 1440?
Thanks
UPD: I found a very useful article on this topic. After reading all my doubts were dispelled! I take a standard 27" monitor with a resolution of 2560 x 1440 and I close this topic for myself for at least 2 years.
Thanks Devman

Answer 1

everything is individual.
IMHO, working in 3840x2160 at 27" is unrealistic - everything is too small.
In hidpi mode - excellent, but there will be an analogue of 1920x1080.

Answer 2

What is the problem?
4k is becoming the standard more and more, therefore developers are implementing Hi-res support everywhere.
Adobe has introduced 200% scale for HiRes displays in recent updates. The same - browsers and office applications.
If finances allow - take 4k. The quality of the picture compared to WQHD is noticeably pleasing.

Answer 3

First of all, I'm concerned about the convenience of moving the cursor around the screen with a resolution of 3840x2160 - in my opinion this is very inconvenient.

There is no difference between moving the cursor on a monitor with a resolution of 320x320 pixels and 100500x100500 pixels. It's all about the size of the monitor, the distance between the user and the monitor, and purely personal preferences (for which there are a lot of settings in any modern OS)

Answer 4

Found a very helpful article on this topic. After reading, all doubts were dispelled! I take a standard 27 "monitor with a resolution of 2560 x 1440 and close this topic for myself for at least 2 years.
Thanks DevMan