Wouldn't it be more correct to use the term "robotics" instead of "robotics"?

Question

IT terminology

In articles and comments on Habrahabr, the first form is almost always used, when reading which the eye stumbles on an extra TO, and when pronouncing it, the tongue stumbles. But the founder of this term, Isaac Asimov, from the very beginning set the second, much more convenient and pleasant form (and it was a leader in applicability for a long time). Why doesn't she live here?

Answer 1

Well, you understand that in the form of a question, I actually put forward here a proposal to the Khabrovites to change the generally accepted and clumsy "robotics" to a more euphonious form that was in circulation when the people were actively reading Azimov. Let's see if it works...
UPD from 03/02/15 - Didn't work, unfortunately. The use of the generally accepted and clumsy "robotics" on Habré continues, and in large numbers. Moreover, it continues with the use of the author of the term, Isaac Asimov , as a context . God, he must be rolling over in his grave! He never used this same "robotics" in his texts, he always spoke and wrote briefly and sonorously - "ROBOTS".

Answer 2

Robotokop

Answer 3

Well, we have a country of "rural-parish" education ...
It seems to me that this is due to: a car, automation, square-nested, gypsum board, etc.
They just attributed it without abbreviation.
Robotics sounds better.

Answer 4

Of course, "robotics" is better, but it has become generally accepted to write "robotics"
at the journalists of the newspaper "Selskaya Nov" probably came up with.