Will the risk level of the output wallet(aml) decrease?

Question

bitcoin

Good afternoon, I want to create my own btc mixer, I delve into all the details :)
Let's say a person transfers 0.1 btc to a wallet controlled by me, from this wallet money is transferred to 3 of my wallets (0.033 .. for each), and after that to the client's wallet. Does it make sense? Will the risk level (aml) for the "output" wallet decrease compared to the "input" wallet (from which the client sent money to me). I know that ideally coins that come from a certain wallet should not go to the final wallet of the same client, but how to achieve this?

Answer 1

but how to achieve it?

client to have two unrelated wallets

Answer 2

In my opinion, mixers, in the current realities of the struggle of regulators with bitcoin (and this is exactly what happens when you are told with pathos about the 'non-banning' of cryptocurrencies and the generation of inadequate laws on digital assets) are useless.
The more transfers are made by users to/from regulated sites, where the user is verified by all available methods (from location by ip, fingerprint of the browser, synchronous counter transactions of the same volume and, of course, phone number) to KYC verification by passport and other documents, the more transfers that cannot be identified, are marked as dangerous.
The entire tree of translations between unidentified users is perceived as one block, and no matter what you mix there, it is marked as dangerous, requiring increased attention.

Answer 3

mixing fits under the international concept of laundering and legalization of funds.
and if you have come up with such a clever idea, then there is no one smarter, who will figure out how to track even 1000 different wallets for a penny?