Wi-Fi bridge, choice of equipment, setup nuances?

Question

Computer networks

It is necessary to connect a private house to the Internet, 60 Mbit / s comes to my apartment, via twisted pair, which I want to transmit via a wi-fi bridge to a private house. The direct distance between us on Google map is 650 meters.
The antenna will be on the roof of a two-story building, on the way to the end subscriber there will be the same two-story buildings and a few trees.
From the equipment I looked at the Ubiquiti LiteBeam M5-23 radio bridge, it works at a purity of 5GHz, there are a lot of dots around at a frequency of 2.4GHz. Ubiquiti LiteBeam M5-23, according to the description, works at a distance of up to 20-30 km (everywhere they write differently) when using similar equipment. It is expensive to take two LiteBeam M5-23 and put on each side. Will it work fine if you put one LiteBeam M5-23 and some kind of wifi router on the second house?
I still don’t understand if the LiteBeam M5-23 can connect to the provider itself if you connect the provider’s wire to it directly? And on the second house, just connect the twisted pair cable from LiteBeam M5-23 to the network card and configure the ip address?
Or any other better options?

Answer 1

Take two SXT and that's it. Everything by default at such a distance will work more than perfectly and the performance is street.
I have two of the same (only AC ) in the industrial zone at 500 meters hold 500 megabits.

Answer 2

What is better than 5GHz or 2.4GHz? if you look at the Fresnel zone, then for 5GHz it is slightly less. and there are a lot of 2.4GHz devices around, and at the expense of 5GHz, I think there is either nothing or one or two home points.

Answer 3

I am an amateur on this topic, but if the task is to save money, then why not fasten a directional one to your router instead of one of the antennas, and put it all to the window. just an idea