Why is CentOS popular?

Question

linux

I noticed that many people choose CentOS as the operating system for the server.
I myself used to use Debian, and later switched to Ubuntu.
What benefits will I get if my servers migrate to CentOS? I have already found several disadvantages, I have not seen any advantages yet.
Googled, but didn't find anything intelligible, only general words: www.interworx.com/community/why-choose-centos-for-...

Answer 1

More and more I am convinced that because of the duration of support.
I can’t find any other explanation, because on CentOS I have to do a lot of unnecessary gestures (or maybe I’m not used to it yet), for example, in search of the necessary packages, the freshness of which I won’t say.
Or here - I just want to remove the dependencies left after removing the package:
Instead of a simple autoremove (yes, it's good that CentOS 7 added this option)
At work, even on CentOS desktops =/ At home and on my servers - Ubuntu.
PS:
Colleagues say - the choice fell on stability and predictability.
PS2:
We also have hundreds/thousands of scripts written that are tailored for CentOS and are part of both internal services and profitable projects. Rewriting for Ubuntu/Debian will take a lot of man-hours, and since the business requires constant feedback from employees and our team is small, we cannot rewrite everything and incur time / money costs.

Answer 2

Linux distributions, especially on the server, are more a matter of taste and work experience than any practical advantages.

Answer 3

A little bit about my experience, how the topstarter had servers on Debian, then he transferred the entire zoo to Ubuntu (from 10 to 15 servers), when he decided to dump from Debian, the choice was between centos and bubunta, why did he stop on bubunta?
It's simple, centos (subjectively naturally) here are the pros: during installation, we immediately select the serv profile and it installs only the necessary packages (lamp means puff and mukskul, proxy means squid, etc.) it’s convenient in general, well, the fact that this brainchild of rhela should somehow authority add, well, and a brand new admin whose just in that period of Delhi kept all the servers on the centos and told me a lot of interesting things, but the methods for implementing the same on debian were not very different.
And now CONS: - FUCKING RPM - I hate it just like javascript and maybe even more (you would never fuck an elephant, although you can burn it? so I wouldn’t, but someone just)))
old packages .. .. no, they’re not that old, but VERY OLD, billions of generations (versions) ago, but someone will say stability is all the trouble, if they were stable, they wouldn’t patch bugs in heaps and didn’t release new rezyl, I always thought and I think that debian-sid is unstable, everything else is quite stable within the framework of current releases .. in the new versions of samba, bugs with winbind were fixed, and centos with planned updates will wait for these fixes a little earlier than in 10,000 years)) well, how can one not mention that the network manager ON THE SERVER TO FUCK ..... it's just, well, fuck him.
Everything in Ubuntu is mediocre and package releases are mediocre, and the speed and ease of setup are mediocre (high convenience in the great and mighty yast, hello open, yes, such servers were also once under my control).
But it has a huge jamb, two initialization systems, it's just horror and trash) only the systemd was left in simple non-LTS releases of new ones, but LTS with 1 system will only be 16.04, so right now I want to conceive a risky venture with distributions of a rolling release, specifically arch

Answer 4

As far as I know, the cent is now under the wing of the cap. maybe I'm wrong. that is, it is sawed by the same developers. it will simply be a platform for running in a new one. in general, your question is from the area "and will it pull in highly loaded services?" I didn't keep those. Alas. and on medium and small loads, it does not differ from the rest of the Linux zoo. Here, two factors play a role. the quality of the turnip filling and the habit of working with this particular distribution. For example, I start to puke at the sight of anyone except Suzy. xs why)

Answer 5

I work with centos, because I once started with Red Hat, got used to its systems for 15 years, and now wtf-s, which some commentators above call centos, I have just when working with debian derivatives :) The most important thing that I like about centos is the efforts to maintain compatibility: even when some new features are added over the years, adapters are left for those who are used to the old ones. For example, when switching to starting services via systemctl, the service command was made a wrapper for it, etc. Software versions do not cause any special problems, the main thing is that vulnerability fixes come out at a reasonable time, and distributions still do not follow important software that is critically fresh. will be stolen, and you will either have to build it yourself, or connect the developer repositories (the same nginx). Well, in general - as they said,

Answer 6

for example.
1C server on Centos is easier to raise.
Especially if you have a bunch of postgres x64 and 1c 32bit, and so that the thin web client works in this bunch.

Answer 7

The seventh centos is unfortunately a little disappointing, in general, quite a lot of products are tailored for redhat, and centos is a free redhat and some software is easier to install on centos and more often there were rpmki.
now the market seems to always make packages for ubuntu, so there are no particular advantages.