Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
At the moment, there are still processors that do not support 64-bit architecture, so it is impossible to refuse to release 32-bit software products. In addition, not all application software can adequately work with 64-bit operating systems.
First of all, 32-bit software requires less RAM than 64-bit software.
Therefore, it will make sense as long as there are computers and virtual machines with less than 4 gigabytes of RAM.
Here are a couple of comparisons from real life:
- askubuntu.com/a/70551/228477 -- 30% difference
- siava.ru/forum/post587057.html#587057 -- fivefold difference
Old hardware - you can’t put more than 2gb of memory, well, why shove 64bit there?
Old programs - there is a lot of software that does not work under 64bit
Drivers - here I have an old and reliable printer like a tank, but firewood is only for 32bit.
Therefore, they are still needed and important.
There are all sorts of situations where time-tested reliability is needed. Various types of machines, medical equipment and so on. Here is for them.
Now almost no longer needed. Previously, 32-bit processors were produced, on which it is impossible to run a 64-bit system, even 64-bit windows has problems with running MS-DOS programs. There are some 32-bit applications that refuse to run on 64-bit Windows (very rare, but it happens). In theory, the larger the bit depth of the processor registers, the more productive it is. In practice, this is true if the program is compiled for a 64-bit architecture and uses operations with large numbers (mathematical, scientific, accounting and cryptographic programs). That is, for most applications there is no significant difference.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question