Why are new weak processors more productive than powerful old ones?

Question

Processors

In general, for example,
Intel Pentium 2117U (1.8 GHz). Energy efficient, cheap and all that
and
AMD Athlon X2 6000+. Old, gluttonous and expensive in 2007 :)
cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Pentium-2117U-vs-AMD-Athlon...
And it turns out to be Intel more productive than AMD...
What parameter makes it more productive?

Answer 1

According to your link it is written that the atlon is more productive.
Yes, it has worse energy efficiency, and it does not have integrated graphics, but the performance on one core and the overall performance is greater for the athlone.
In general, in addition to the frequency, the processor has such things as architecture, sets of built-in commands. A lot depends on this.

Answer 2

вы смотрите говно рейтинг не про производительносить, а делаете говно выводы, если уж смотреть то на набор инструкций , частоту и количество ядер, сомневаюсь что пентиум будет в чем то быстрее.