Who tried Adobe Extract for layout, instead of Photoshop?

Question

css

Adobe recently introduced a new online service for extracting resources and even CSS code from a layered PSD file, the service does not require Photoshop and works in the cloud exclusively using a browser.
www.adobe.com/ru/creativecloud/extract.html
At the moment I'm more than satisfied, although there is a normal full-fledged Photoshop available, but I'm still just learning to make up and I have nothing to compare with. Maybe one of the experienced layout designers tried to use this service and can tell in detail what they liked / did not like? Can this service fully replace Photoshop with Linux? Or will a good old Photoshop with a couple of slicing plugins be faster and more convenient?

Answer 1

It is built into brackets, I tried to transfer to it. In general, either I'm not used to it or it's uncomfortable, but I spent more time.

Answer 2

This is not a replacement for Photoshop. This is an opportunity to turn psd into css. I have not used it, but I am sure that the code is extremely dirty and not optimal. In which then the devil will break his leg. Perhaps for a person who wants to quickly make up a template - this is an option. But as for me - heresy. Moreover, it is integrated with Dreamweaver, which is not the best solution for layout.

Answer 3

I used, now I continue to work in Brackets, as for me with Adobe Extract, Brackets dulls.
If you want more ways to turn it into css, then avocode.com and the plugin for photoshop css3ps.com are good for me, they complement each other with the first.

Answer 4

Nothing replaces manual layout. For me, attempts to create something that "goes by itself, if you give a kick" ...
Note: typesetting in "staples"
Confused by the title: "Who tried Adobe Extract for typesetting, instead of Photoshop?"
It reads as if you are typesetting in Photoshop))