Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
OpenVPN gives good speed if it is prepared correctly, SoftEtherVPN has good speed on its own protocol, but still don’t jump above the channel, if the channel itself is shit, then changing the VPN will not help much here.
I rented my VPS in the minimum configuration for 180 rubles, set up an OpenVPN server on it. Everything is working. By the way, as already mentioned, for physical. persons Yota cuts VPN connections, but if the contract is drawn up for legal. face - everything should be fine.
Try to encrypt PPTP using transport IPSec, from QoS on the Yota side, this will hide your tunnel and, in theory, they will not cut the speed.
It would also not hurt to measure the speed to the remote office using BTest and compare it with the speed of the tunnel, if there is a strong difference - dig an alternative or a way to bypass QoS (but PPTP itself is a very fast protocol, since, in fact, there is only encapsulation and tiny encryption, almost no overhead), if Btest also shows low speed, then you need to dig routes and providers.
For physicists, the best option is OpenVPN over tcp:443 port, imho. I use it this way myself.
About cuts the speed up to 64 kbps.
I don’t know how it is in other regions, but in mine I don’t see any problems with this. Although, it is quite possible to catch OpenVPN by handshake.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question