C
C
ChrisJonson2016-04-19 19:19:37
JavaScript
ChrisJonson, 2016-04-19 19:19:37

Which player is more effective for online cinema?

Which player is more effective for online cinemas? For a long time everyone has been talking about the fact that flash is dying, large services are abandoning it in favor of html5. Then why do all online cinemas, or Moonwalk for example, use flash players? Maybe they are faster when it comes to HD quality over 720?
If the answer is flash, then what kind of player to take so that you can stylize and customize it for yourself?
If html5, then what to use in this case? Heard about video.js, is it suitable for large videos in high quality?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

3 answer(s)
M
Mellowtoy, 2016-04-19
@ChrisJonson

Do all online cinemas use flash? All online cinemas use moonwalk. They may want more compatibility, but they don't have options. It doesn't depend on them. There are only a couple of cinemas that distribute videos themselves and, unfortunately, they suck at it.
What kind of video you have - 360p or 1080p, does not play a special role when choosing a player. Flash will not give you speed. Here the server and the channel are already important. Choose any player based on your personal requirements for it. Video.js is not a bad option, a lot of people use it.

S
Sergey Goryachev, 2016-04-19
@webirus

Have you tried Flash player on iPhone?
Questions will disappear by themselves.

C
CODEzavr, 2016-04-19
@CODEzavr

uppod is advised + a third-party implementation of a videoscript type grabber (on Google, first link).

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question