Which of the modern Linux distributions to choose for a laptop?

Question

linux

Given:
Corei3 laptop, 8 GB RAM, Disk for the main Linux partition 22GB
Left about 40GB on the "window" SSD for the Linux Home partition + NTFS non-system partition with 100GB documents.

Hardware specifications:
Manufacturer ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
Model UX32VD
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3217U CPU @ 1.80GHz, 1801MHz, Cores: 2, logical processors: 4
BIOS Version American Megatrends Inc. UX32VD.214, 01/29/2013
SMBIOS version 2.7
BIOS mode UEFI
Main board model UX32VD Richoh SP150SU
printer

After a small upgrade (SSD and windows 10 Pro), the built-in 22GB SSD remained unattached in the laptop.
I want to put Linux there.

Usage scenario - home and a little bit of research:
web surfing, instant messengers (viber, skype, telegram...), office suites, movie watching, youtube, torrents.

Which of the modern Linux distributions to choose?

Not a housewife, I can write scripts in Powershell, VBS, Bash, python
if necessary

Answer 1

Everyone, thanks for the advice.
I specify the questions of
Ubuntu, Fedora, Mint, OpenSuse:
1. Everywhere I choose a distribution from the LTS line?
2. Where are the recommended system requirements for Linux distributions? It seems that marketers managed to rape Linuxoids too ... For 30 minutes of googling yesterday, I did not find such information.
3. Are the main programs placed on the system partition? Will I be able to push myself so that the system is operational when the ssd is turned off with Windows?
There will be 20GB of built-in SSD.
Answer: Installed Fedora 31. Xfce. So far, everything you need and home has been crammed into 20GB

Answer 2

Linux mint. With mate shell or xfce.
All drivers included, all software included

Answer 3

Ubuntu. Other hipster systems will only add surprises.

Answer 4

Rosa Fresh is good in terms of Russification of packages + initially everything is set up, as for housewives. If there is no time, install it, if there is time, then try KUbuntu or Manjaro KDE.

Answer 5

kubuntu / ubuntu / xubuntu - in general, any of the ubuntu family (they differ in the pre-installed choice of DE) not because the best but because the community is the most, and questions with answers in Google are more likely to be about it.
ps be prepared for problems with hardware, as leather manufacturers climb to put spokes in the wheels of a competitor, namely the operation of the GPU and peripherals is not guaranteed to be the one that is familiar. For example, switching a discrete / built-in video card, or incorrect operation of the touchpad (more precisely, there are no manufacturer's features but are present from the Linux community), an idle bluetooth, etc.

Answer 6

My personal top:
1. Debian
2. Mint
3. Kubuntu
All three are stable, have a good community and, as they say, out-of-the-box setup is ready. Do something with your hands only if it's something specific. From the environment I advise sneakers, for a long time I sat on the third dwarf and mate. The gnome is greedy. Mate is good, but not particularly pleasing to the eye. KDE is more beautiful and flexible, with the latest updates it eats very little and a lot of native software.
I personally use debian with kde.

Answer 7

1. Leave LTS to the servers, normal ones are better on the desktop. Get a more up-to-date set of software when the time comes, it's easy to update everything.
2. Linux is one core, the requirements are for software and graphical shell. KDE, Gnome are usually for more productive systems, Lxde, Xfce for less productive ones, eat up less memory.
3. Programs during installation are placed on the main partition. You can make any folder a separate section, often make separate home folders / home and / var / log for logs. If you really feel like it, mount the Windows partition for your files.

Answer 8

Fedora KDE has a minimum of problems with hardware and OS. rpm based.
99% of tasks with the mouse.
Working NetworkManager and ModemManager.
Fresh software without ancient bugs, hello to debians with their ubunts :) (not for the sake of holivar, really old packages, look at su, a bloody bug with non-interactive mode has not been fixed for many years)

Answer 9

Xubuntu. Everything out of the box, I think that this is a middle ground between a flexible and stable debian and newfangled manjaro, albeit different bases.
As a starting distribution for learning, it is better to take debian netinstall + google. Everything is moderately simple and gives basic knowledge.

Answer 10

The sincere and furious indignation at the lack of system requirements is surprising. Now so much code is being produced and changed daily that writing detailed and up-to-date documentation becomes a truly overwhelming task even for industry giants who produce commercial products. Therefore, only what is important is written and will remain relevant for a sufficient period. And then about, which is already clear only from absolutely nothing to do.
Instead of half an hour of googling, it was already possible to install some kind of distribution.
For example Ubuntu LTS.

Answer 11

12 years ago I switched to Linux, the first distribution kit that lasted for me for almost 5 years was ubuntu, then I switched to Linux mint, on which I now sit, from DE to ubuntu there was a gnome, on sinammon mint, started on weak hardware, then switched to i3, now AMD x4, in principle, Linux can be run on any hardware that has a processor, even weak Raspberries pull it. It's a matter of taste, you need to put and try. I have not yet decided on the first distribution kit, I tried 15 pieces, you can generally install puppy linux, it is generally installed in RAM, its weight is about 200 meters.

Answer 12

Rosa Kde4
Mint mate

Answer 13

I'll add my one penny:
openSUSE.
Pros:
Well prepared KDE.
One of the best package managers.
YaST can be very helpful in the beginning.
Of the minuses:
You need to connect a third-party repository (packman). This is done in a couple of clicks through the same yast, but first you need to find out.