Which monitor to choose for a layout designer?

Question

Monitors

Huge selection on the market. Is there any point in 4k? Do layout designers get annoyed by curved shapes? What does it have to do with monitors like 21:9 (resolution 3440x1440). Is it convenient to use this in everyday life? How do you think?

Answer 1

Which monitor to choose for a layout designer in 2019?

widescreen or 2 instead of one
No
if layout designers had separated into a separate group several million years ago, then perhaps they would have had such serious psychological features along with the fourth hand.
programmatically or mentally

Answer 2

21:9

Conveniently. I myself use LG 29UM68-P, it is very convenient to use for layout. Part of the screen is occupied by the browser with livereload, and the other part by the editor. This is much more convenient than two monitors, because. no need to shake your neck too much. There is also no frame in the middle. Another plus is the fact that films are shot under such a film, and there are no stripes at the top (but in TV shows and YouTube videos there are stripes on the sides), you can also play very cool.
At work I have two 24' monicas, and at home I have one 29' wide, and in comparison, one wide is much more comfortable than two regular ones.

Answer 3

It's best not to get too exotic. Because you catch up on your monitor, and then the client on a wretched 19 "section will complain and send a bunch of fixes to do. Otherwise, in general, he will look at the netbook and complain that everything is somehow different from everyone else.

Answer 4

Take a closer look at 144Hz, I took an acer xf240h, the matrix is ​​​​of course tn + film, but, they will sit for a week at such a hertz, I will no longer be able to sit at a regular monitor)

Yeah, right now I would take 144 hertz for layout and static objects. Thanks neighing.

Is there any point in 4k?

Why not? There will be a monitor with a margin. When making layout, you will simply set the resolution you need in the application: 720, 1080, 2k, 4k. You will observe how the layout will look on all options. Size doesn't matter, it's just convenience. In the era of 4k monitors, I would already take them, what's the point of taking things that will soon go out of use, and the monitor is not taken for 1 year.
So I would choose 4k, it will not decrease.

Do layout designers get annoyed by curved shapes?

Not right away, it really interferes with both designers and layout designers. You take it not in toys to play with complete immersion. And docking pixel to pixel on a crooked monitor is a horror.

What does it have to do with monitors like 21:9 (resolution 3440x1440).

Plenty of room on the sides for different menus and tools to fit everything on one monitor. I didn't get it.
Take only IPS, no TN or TN + film.

Answer 5

I also ask this question) since I plan to update my two full-hd one to 24, the second to 27 - as for me, full-hd is already not enough especially for 27) one, but from 21:9 I don’t consider it because two in any case more convenient. But I also think 2k, or 4k right away - in terms of inches, I think 27 will be just right.

Answer 6

Either 27" 4k and use it in HiDPI to enjoy good pixel density in a 1920x1080 workspace (200% UI), or 34" 21:9 with regular pixel density, but with a gorgeous 3440x1440 workspace. Well, take the model without pwm.

Answer 7

Depends on the workplace. If the monitor is close, then 27 may be inconvenient in landscape orientation. Too big.

Answer 8

IPS, 23"-27", 2 full hd is better than one 4k.