Which is more promising Ubiquiti or MikroTik?

Question

Mikrotik

Gonna dive headfirst into wireless networks. I want to work in this area and in the future provide equipment installation services.
To do this, you need to take courses from some company, so I'm wondering which is more promising, Ubiquiti or MikroTik. In terms of UX and ease of installation, it seems to me Ubnt, but why then in Russia is it mostly only MikroTik?

Answer 1

Looking at what goals to pursue.
Ubiquiti - pure wifi, nothing more. By setting - the usual linux inside. There are no tricks with routing, switching in them. There is not and will not be any BGP, OSPF, extended routing table, all sorts of L2 features. Very well suited for low cost radio bridges in various topologies.
Mikrotik - wifi is basically a side feature. These are more routers. Supports a lot of things for a device of this level. But it’s sad with wifi - there are no built-in spectrum measurement tools, WDS technology is crooked (maybe it has already been corrected), there are no airomax-type goodies, no MIMO. Perhaps this will not happen.
On the other hand, if you are targeting wireless networks, maybe you should choose the courses of a manufacturer of some RRL or more professional equipment (for example, aruba)? More expensive, but they are sharpened for wireless purposes.

Answer 2

I will answer as a person who has worked with Mikrotik for a year and a week ago completed the first MTCNA course.
On the hardware - Mikrotik has Atheros chip specs, respectively, it is Mikrotik that has the ability to flexibly control the WiFi signal (and indeed everything that can relate to WiFi).
But, in order to be objective, Mikrotik has a very unbalanced product line, so for some tasks it can be cheaper to take yubiks. By the way, Mikrotiks get along well with ubiks even within the framework of one link, not to mention routing, PoE and other side things when building radio links.
IMHO, I would go to tick courses, and I would go to yubiks later, for general development. In any case, such work requires physics and several calculator files for the Fresnel zone, antenna gains, etc.

Answer 3

Which is more promising Ubiquiti or MikroTik?

they coexist and do not interfere with each other, so study all the vendors, otherwise your opinion runs the risk of becoming biased in your work..)

Answer 4

Imkho first of all it is necessary to pass complex courses cisco. Because they provide a very good theoretical background that can be transferred to others. Plus, in the near future, cisco specialists will not be left without bread. And then you can Something youthful, progressive, fashionable. Ubikuts are, of course, fashionable and cheap, but making money on them is not easy, because they put them where they want to save money.

Answer 5

If purely wireless networks and choose from these two vendors, then, IMHO, Ubiki.

Answer 6

and that yubikuti observed courses? I know that Mikrotik has a certification system.

Answer 7

The phrase “Dive headlong into wireless networks” can be understood in different ways, wireless networks in terms of home and office Wi-Fi is one thing, radio bridges are another, if you build a home network in any large private houses, I would probably use a MikroTik router , but as Ubiquiti UniFi + Cloud Key points. If we are talking about radio bridges, then you need to look individually, in general, probably Ubiquiti, but I installed Wap 60G myself, it works at a short distance of 200 m, but the speed is 1 Gbps, everything is individual.