Which is better for a web developer: Linux Mint or Ubuntu?

Question

linux

I thought about switching from Windows to Linux, there is a lot of talk about web developers working on Linux and Mac. We are not talking about a complete rejection of Windows, rather this is an experiment to test the convenience of working on Linux, especially for Linux there is simply no some convenient software that I am used to working with, the same Photoshop of the modern version (is there something fresh CS6 there at all? ). In general, if you choose between Ubuntu and Mint - which is more appropriate?

Answer 1

You ask a question that gets sucked up and down on the Toaster every month.
This means that there is no habit of google and the ability to read googled.
Therefore, Linux is contraindicated. Dixi.

Answer 2

A matter of personal preference.
Try both, leave the distribution that you like best.
Mint is based on Ubuntu.

Answer 3

Set a minute. But the idea itself is the same. If only a couple of days to indulge. Preferably in a virtual machine.

Answer 4

Vagrant allows you to keep both at the same time. But it is more logical to use the distribution that will be later on the server.

Answer 5

What is what is. Mint will be more convenient, it's like a slightly modified ubunta. Packages for both deb, the package manager is the same, the difference is only external. In terms of work - there is no difference (although I'm more on the backend). Install both on a virtual machine or boot one by one through a live image and poke both. IMHO, after Windows Mint will be more convenient and familiar than the usual ubunt. There are rumors that all sorts of photoshops can be run through wine, but I personally have not tried
P.S. Do you even need it? If you have Windows 10, then use the Windows Subsystem for Linux - this is enough for you for web development and you will stay on Windows

Answer 6

the same Photoshop of the modern version (

Wow, are you ready to buy it? :)
As for the question - put what there are gurus next to. And do not put on a separate section - otherwise you will annoy later with questions "how to remove the linux bootloader." Put it on a virtual machine.

Answer 7

Use the system that suits you. On Windows, the usability of the interface is much better worked out on the little things that are missing in the Linux axes. I also did not find a convenient analogue of notepad ++ on Linux. For half a year I "was tormented, injected and ate continued to eat a cactus," until my passion for music could not stand it and put cubes + external sound.
My opinion: it doesn’t matter what to develop on, the main thing is that it was convenient. And for debugging and testing, you can use either virtual machines or the same docker.

Answer 8

It depends on what you are developing and what will be on the server. Some packages I need are not installed on Windows. It's just written there that they work only under niks. Unless, of course, virtual machines and docker, but these are unnecessary gestures (especially on Windows).
I installed Mint first (as there was an installation flash drive at hand), there were small dances with a tambourine to connect the Ubuntu repositories with packages. As a result, I have Ubuntu 18.04 LTS on all servers and on my working laptop. It turned out to be the most convenient option.

Answer 9

Put both systems on the vitrualka and poke. No Mac or Linux will give you a performance boost, it's all about convenience and the ability to use. If you are comfortable on Windows, then sit on it, the transition to any other system should be justified, until you can give yourself a clear answer why you need it, it makes no sense to switch.

Answer 10

I would suggest adding Manjaro (DE to taste) to the selection. And in fact, everything is the same, what you like more, then put it, in any case, you will get invaluable experience!

Answer 11

Mint...

Answer 12

I am for Mint. I just like DE Cinnamon better than Gnome in its current form.

Answer 13

Mint. Everything is simple and accessible out of the box. Interface like winXP and win7.
Mnu has been working on a virtual machine 24/7 for 2 years - the flight is normal. Installed: Nginx+MSSQL (yes, now also under Linux).
Tools: VSCode, Git, AzureDataStudio.
Against ubunta: out of the box it is naked (I installed Ubuntu 19.04) - you need to install and configure a lot, in Mint the interface is simpler and more practical out of the box.

Answer 14

If you have never worked with desktop Linux for a long time, then definitely install Mint. It's based on Ubuntu, so most tutorials on the net will work very well for it. It’s just that in Mint everything is very well done so that newcomers are as comfortable as possible in Linux. You will be much less struggling with Linux itself, and you will work more.
Photoshop can be installed on a virtual machine. And for not very complex layouts, I generally use "online photoshop" that perfectly reads PSD https://www.photopea.com/
WSL - Windows Subsystem for Linux - is another solution. But you will fight with him notably. Real Linux after it, like mountain air after a traffic jam in Moscow

Answer 15

Personally, I chose Mint. But this is a matter of taste, because. the difference is mainly in the graphical shell. And I'm for the classics. Regarding Photoshop: check out Gimp. It may not be familiar at first, but it is quite a good replacement. But as an editor, I would advise M $ - cue Visual Studio Code. Both gimp and VSCode work under both Windu and Tench, so there is no difference.

Answer 16

but I think it is necessary to put arch. of course, the installation is a little more complicated, but there are scripts that allow you to launch arch the first time in 15-20 minutes of time, you don’t even need to think about anything. and in the end you will get a system that you will like more than anything else. not a single deb rpm and other crap can compare with pacman and aura

Answer 17

alpine

Answer 18

Until you try it yourself, no stories will help. And if you ask about it, then you will not leave Windows, because. only it is adapted for such weaklings who do not study the essence of the issue, but immediately ask someone.
I have been using Linux Mint since February. Nothing out of the ordinary, it has its own brakes and glitches (of which Windows has a hell of a lot more). Linux Mint is intended for Windows users, because during installation, all kinds of software are installed so that users do not go to the forums later and whine about the fact that it is not installed, but it cannot be found at all. In the near future I plan to switch to pure Debian, because. this is a platform for creation - once you customize it for yourself, install the necessary packages and applications, and you will not know the age of trouble. And I need a minimum: git, composer, docker, nodejs, python, Java and Android studio, netbeans or phpstorm.
As for applications - everything is for Linux. Photoshop will replace Gimp for you. You can also run any Windows application from snap packages. Yes, and a lot of necessary applications can be assembled from source in a couple of minutes.

Answer 19

I used to sit on Ubuntu for a long time, but it was because of the adobe products that I returned to Windu. It's really easy to set everything up as Niks, there is an excellent Gita application, a console application with full support for the Linux terminal and bash. The node is installed without problems for us. Etc. While I'm on Windows.