Where is the right place to store videos?

Question

YouTube

The bottom line is that there is hosting, there is a limit outgoing in pm, 20 TB
. There are about 10 videos on the site that we now store on YouTube and their viewing is, well, a maximum of 100 of each per month.
Why not host them on your own server?
The outgoing channel, according to my estimates, is about 40 mb / s.
Why am I even wondering - today I accidentally looked at the site of a provincial online store and noticed that its videos with product demonstrations are hosted on vimeo
What is the cost of paid hosting on vimeo and why not on YouTube? Why is he so cute? Why is that small store, according to my estimates with a modest income, can afford paid video hosting on the specified resource?
Thanks to those who answered!

Answer 1

On YouTube, you are a powerless content generator (that is, you work for YouTube, and not for you) and at any time the video can be completely or partially blocked and the channel itself can be deleted. And on a paid hosting you already have at least some rights and guarantees. But you need to read the user agreement, maybe there are some other goodies.

Answer 2

At myself.
But as long as your Internet channel has a reserve of bandwidth: videos are not watched often and not all at the same time.
And this is a very large stock, because. videos are never downloaded in their entirety when viewed on the site, but are streamed in small data packets.

Answer 3

Hosting on your own server is really hard. Video streaming is a complex task with a lot of nuances, much more difficult than it seems at first glance.
I myself am not an expert in this matter, but I had an indirect relationship with the development of the video platform and out of the corner of my eye I saw that developers have to solve a mountain of problems.

Answer 4

Vimeo is better, de facto it is the standard for business, they have ceased to compete with YouTube and are developing in this segment, packages there start at $ 15, not so expensive
, but the option with Cloudflare and cheap storage is also possible: you can’t stream, just wait for a full load, but with modern home channels ~ 100 Mbit is not such a problem, you only need a proger to set up scripts + player

Answer 5

Youtube bypasses everyone in terms of ease of access to the Internet. It makes sense to host it, but you need to store copies of the video on your server, in case something happens to the YouTube channel.
You can also make a backup of the channel on YouTube.