Where is the quality of education at PMI 01.03.02 higher: at MPEI or MAI?

Question

IT education

I am very interested in the opinion of those who are personally familiar with the system of training programmers at the PMI at MPEI and MAI. Can't decide at all. Studied curricula, living conditions, different ratings (do not inspire confidence). One gets the impression that they are approximately the same in terms of the quality of training programmers. Is it really true? The top universities for the training of programmers (PhysTech, Higher School of Economics, Moscow State University, ITMO, MEPhI) cannot get it on the budget, so please do not offer.

Answer 1

In 100500 times - the university will not teach programming. They can give some superficial base on languages ​​and technologies, no more. You can become a great programmer even without a university. If you want to become a programmer, then you should start now and on your own, and finish the university for a crust

Answer 2

Do not confuse programming and mathematics.
Algorithms are good. But this is included in the concept of higher education, not programming. All this was studied long before computers in general.
And the best teaching is where the student learns best. You need to learn more than the program. There are more than enough materials for this.

Answer 3

Without detracting from the merits of the university as an educational institution (I myself have 2 higher education institutions), I can say that the question was asked not entirely correct and completely by the resource. At least for a normal answer, you need to be trained in all three and give your own subjective assessment, which, firstly, is unrealistic, and secondly, it can be completely useless for you, because "all felt-tip pens are different." And secondly - there are few students here (IMHO), maybe look at more specialized study forums?
For the rest - yes, I didn’t need matan (!), Difuras (!), Measure theory, equations of mathematical physics and even the theory of irrational numbers, but discreet, automata theory, graph theory, theorver, algebra and set theory were quite useful. Well, specialized subjects, such as the basics of rbd, cluster analysis, (surprise!) programming, the basics of op. systems. Another question is that I learned all this 20+ years ago, and now there are many other sources of information. But the structural approach to teaching at the university has not changed, and this is the norm. They learn slowly, but you come out with a normal set of knowledge, universal for most areas. All the "hot young" are in a hurry to rush into IT for a long ruble here and now, "spend 3 whole years on education - pfft, don't make me laugh," they grab on top, then you look at these crafts and think,

Answer 4

in student