A
A
ASX42016-03-17 22:07:05
Delphi
ASX4, 2016-03-17 22:07:05

What to study after Delphi?

The situation is this. I'm 15, I've been programming for a year already, spent half a year on Pascal and Delphi. Recently I realized that it is possible to tie with Delphi, tk. figured out what's what and is ready to develop further. Recently I took 1st place in a city programming competition (I wrote an arkanoid), everything is fine with my studies. Tell me which way to go next, can you recommend some literature (I want to go further towards application development). I will be grateful))

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

7 answer(s)
D
Daniil Demidko, 2016-03-19
@ASX4

Mastered Delphi? Can you throw buttons on the form? Do you even write code a little more?
Wow... In just six months...
That's it, you don't need to learn anything else. You can go to work.
Seriously, it's best to remove Delphi RIGHT NOW and start learning C++, Java or C#.
From scratch. At first, there will be a greater desire to drop it all and return to the cozy world of molds and := . But if you overcome it, then this is already a step towards correction. In a couple of months you will remember about Delphi only with disgust and horror.

Z
Zhbert, 2016-03-17
@Zhbert

It's not about literature. Delphi, as an object-oriented pascal, is very good for a start, because it does not allow you to shoot off your legs, like, for example, si or pluses, and it has a lot of application possibilities. I once studied it myself (albeit after assembler under pikmicro) as the first high-level language in which I then wrote my first "viruses". I can say one thing - if you comprehended the basics of programming and learned algorithms and acquired the appropriate thinking, then the language will not be so important to you, because the basics are basically the same everywhere, and it’s not so difficult to comprehend some differences or goodies of individual languages. I would advise you to continue to do a lot differently than you want, because learning a language just for the sake of the language is a dead end. You need to set yourself a task (for example, you want to make some kind of program for yourself, which you need) and start sawing it. For implementation, you choose a more suitable language (here you can consult, yes), focusing more on the features of languages ​​​​and from, let's say, orientation, and not on a Wishlist or a fool (I know a chela who, because of some of his kookies, writes sites in C, and considers this the norm). Having chosen a language and a task, you begin to write, solving the difficulties that arise along the way. This approach gives you two pluses - involvement and interest, which quickly go away if you learn something just like that by reading a book. Having chosen a language and a task, you begin to write, solving the difficulties that arise along the way. This approach gives you two pluses - involvement and interest, which quickly go away if you learn something just like that by reading a book. Having chosen a language and a task, you begin to write, solving the difficulties that arise along the way. This approach gives you two pluses - involvement and interest, which quickly go away if you learn something just like that by reading a book.
All this is IMHO, of course.

E
evgeniy_lm, 2016-03-18
@evgeniy_lm

After "learning" any language, you don't need to learn anything else.
You do not understand the essence of programming a little. It is important not in what language you write programs, but how much these programs are in demand.
I have been writing in Delphi for 20 years and every day I learn something new about it, and you learned it in half a year. Are you a child prodigy? In fact, you didn’t learn anything, but conscientiously copied useless examples from some book for beginners, i.e. You haven't even started learning Delphi yet. The same goes for any language you take up (book-examples-hooray learned!-What's next?). In 10 years you will "know" 15-20 "cool" languages ​​and sincerely wonder why your friend Vasya Pupkin earns disproportionately more on fucking VBA. But in fact, the answer is simple Vasya did not waste time on the useless study of useless languages, but learned to write programs, which I advise you

M
Maronus, 2016-03-17
@Maronus

In which direction to go further, you must decide for yourself. Programming can be done in a variety of areas: from games to space launches. Decide what interests you, look at what technologies / languages ​​/ algorithms / etc you need to know in order to work in this area, and only then can you look for some literature in the right direction.

Z
zugo, 2016-03-17
@zugo

Here, many will now begin to be smart (in fact, already), that the language is not important, the fundamental principles and scope are important, etc.
Although this is true, but the question "what to study after Delphi" can be answered much more simply and unambiguously - study C # (and the .NET / Mono platform, of course) :) It is in many ways similar to Delphi, only much more modern and in demand, and used in a variety of areas - from the web to embedded systems.

A
Alexander Skusnov, 2016-03-18
@AlexSku

If it was Delphi 7 on VCL, then you can learn the FM (Fire Monkey) library on Delphi XE.
For the institute, I suggest MatLab, because. there are many formulas and it is easier to display the results.
If, after toys, you want to move on to "simulators" (that is, simulators, for example, for cars or planes), then C ++ and the DirectX library will be needed for graphics.

G
Grigory Esin, 2016-03-18
@xotey83

You can freelance for German customers: they love Delphi.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question