L
L
lightalex2016-04-14 15:55:08
Iron
lightalex, 2016-04-14 15:55:08

What processor is better to take for the server?

Hello! I needed a
server for several sites Regular sites -
html + css + js, php, node.js, mysql online The budget for the processor is 30-50k No experience in building and managing a dedicated server (suddenly this is important) I would like Intel (as far as I know the best solution for servers, if I'm mistaken - write) The system should be as quiet as possible, therefore the less heat generation - the better Socket is not important . What are the options for such a budget with such requirements? I also ask you to write the predicted maximum online for the main site

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

4 answer(s)
V
Vasily, 2016-04-15
@Foolleren

If the server is at home (there is fast and convenient physical access), and 32 GB is enough, you can take it based on AMD (8370 8350 9370) (I don’t recommend 9590, even top motherboards can hardly drag it) and an Asus motherboard (for example, Sabertus and Maximus exactly allow) and enable ECC in the RAM. accordingly, take a non-registered RAM with ECC (for example, Kingston (KVR16E11 / 8) or (KVR18E13 / 8)), this significantly reduces the likelihood of failure, such goodies from Intel are available only in the server segment (despite the fact that Intel declares support in the specifications for the processor ECC to find a BIOS matrix that allows this very support to be included is another task, although it is possible that there are such chipsets based on C *** chipsets). take a more powerful cooler. judging by your budget, you can assemble two "servers" on such a base, and even the UPS will remain,
Solving the problem of hypothetical freezes with a hardware watchdog will turn out to be cheap and angry, but without the ability to get into the BIOS from a smartphone.

P
Platon Platonovich, 2016-04-14
@ISEETHESTARS

What socket? Uncle.
If the question as a whole is about which system to take, then just ask.

D
Dmitry, 2016-04-14
@Tabletko

It seems to me that this is shooting sparrows from a cannon - buying a whole server for the sake of a couple of sites. Try to start with some VPS in a small configuration, evaluate the load and see what will be missing. Your budget of 100-150k (slip in the comments) may be enough for several years.

J
Janus74, 2016-04-15
@Janus74

It is better to rent VDS for your task. Because 150k will not be enough to ensure fault tolerance and availability. In addition to the server, you will need to buy a good UPS, several independent Internet access lines from different providers using different backbone providers, you will need to buy an autonomous system (ip address pool), backup power (install a diesel generator), hire people who will monitor this 24/7 - all this no longer fits into the budget, and without this, you cannot guarantee fault tolerance. Therefore, if you are not going to build a data center, this is definitely a VDS rental.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question