What OS is better to choose (gate, smb, ftp, vpn etc.)?

Question

linux

Tasks:
Gateway (we distribute the Internet network through NAT),
Firewall (there),
Routing (we want to forward a given port to a given machine),
FTP (for an external network and local area),
SMB (Windows needs to be given access to files, mainly 1Сv7 file bases ),
VPN server (collect internal machines and external branches in one network)
Backup (it is desirable, of course, to archive the whole thing incrementally)
While I chose CentOS, it seems that with this system of tasks you can achieve less blood, less knowledge of Linux. It is desirable that people in the event of a breakdown could at least explain something (the presence of a GUI). I read about jambs with Cent, but I don’t seem to have such tasks foreseen. For a screw with bases, it is desirable, if I'm not mistaken, to use Raizor FS? How backups are made in this system - I have no idea at all. I would be grateful for the Orthodox explanations.

Answer 1

Use the distribution that uses the Linuxoid familiar to you, after asking him if this Linux is suitable for a beginner (so as not to suddenly get on LFS).

Answer 2

1 and perhaps the most important: Use the OS that you know best, because the responsibility for its work will be on you, not on the familiar Linuxoid.
2. All of the above (gateway, databases, backup) on one machine is the worst thing you can think of and implement. All three roles must be on different devices in order not to hack the gateway, steal databases and erase backups.

Answer 3

Debian. Why not?

Answer 4

Any Linux distribution is suitable for these tasks. By the ease of setting up all this goodness, I liked OpenSUSE more (personal opinion) here is a discussion. And about backup, there are different ways and there are a lot of them.

Answer 5

You're right, use Centos or OEL as most of the descriptions of server solutions on the internet are based on RHEL. I didn’t quite understand why you need a GUI, editing configuration files is no different. As for the FS for samba, I think it's not important, if I'm wrong, let them correct me. I would not unite the gateway and the internal smb server on the same machine, for security reasons. You can simply archive configs to the backup account, or take configs and databases using rsync to another machine. If the infrastructure is large enough, you can read about bacula or amanda.

Answer 6

If you don't have experience with a Linux distribution, why, then, did you choose it? I assumed that you have experience with Windows, so install Windows Server and configure as you can, there are GUI and backups that you know, and native directory sharing (smb). Or do you focus on self-education? Or do you need it for free?

Answer 7

Try Zentyal - no knowledge of Linux is required, it's a ready-made all-in-one server with a good web interface based on Ubuntu.
At least it will satisfy all your requirements.

Answer 8

There are only two distributions in the mainstream, Centos and Ubuntu, so the choice is not great.
suse dies
freebsd lags behind in development without a proper
gentoo package manager for special perverts
and everything else is not mainstream, which means less documentation, fewer solved bugs on the Internet, more difficult to transfer cases and other enterprise problems.

Answer 9

Taking into account that 10 computers are unlikely to grow to 150, so
I advise you to distribute the Internet using a Mikrotik-type Soho router.
On the machine, raise the vmware type hypervisor.
Separately build a file server such as a cheap computer.
Don't forget the interrupter.

Answer 10

And don't forget about FreeBSD ^)

Answer 11

"The one that your Linuxoid friend knows well" :)