Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
What is your opinion on the Stylus preprocessor?
I tried all the main ones, and the stylus seemed cool and modern at first. But when I jump to finalize or fix the previous layout that was on Sass, you realize that you already forget to put parentheses and semicolons on the machine.
How are you with Stylus?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Put semicolons? Colon?
Use Emmet.
And you will write p0+m0. And what it will unfold will depend on the preprocessor itself :)
Stylus is cool. Slowly migrating from SCSS to Stylus.
Personally, I consider it bad form not to put a colon and a semicolon, because readability is violated. This is essentially comparable to parentheses in js. In the if ... else construct, they can be omitted if the function is in one line, otherwise they have to be added anyway ...
Personally, I settled on LESS on preprocessors. In it, in comparison with the stylus, and the same sass, there are no cycles, but this somehow does not bother much, and the logic for substituting mixins is much simpler.
The stylus is great, but you don't have to get used to preprocessors.
Now I look at css and see how much garbage there is, I’m generally silent about saas, this is some kind of dump after the stylus.
By the way, no one bothers to use emmet in place with stylus
Switched from Scss to Stylus... so far the first month, but already happiness is not measured, freedom is felt. Sprites are not really generated with it, but I found how to do it through Gulp. Now I'm looking at Jade and Slime... but so far Emmet is satisfied with this.
Stylus is a good preprocessor, it seems to me that pythonists love it very much (do not forget about indentation), do not put colons and semicolons. Even Yandex chose this preprocessor habrahabr.ru/company/yandex/blog/169415.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question