Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
What is the risk of missing graphics in an Android application for all screens (ldpi, mdpi, hdpi)?
As you know, in an Android application for each screen density, it is recommended
to have a separate image file (ldpi, mdpi, hdpi, xhdpi)
developer.android.com/guide/topics/resources/provi...
In practice, it is enough to have graphics in the xhdpi folder to everything was displayed as it should on all screens.
No problems with rendering, speed of work were noticed on any phone.
Even on the most ancient versions of Android and small screens.
That is, they perfectly scale high-resolution images (xhdpi) and display as needed.
It is clear that there are recommendations, specifications, lint and so on.
And I still try to follow these requirements according to the schedule.
But it takes a decent amount of time and I want to understand the causes and effects.
Since there are always other more real problems on which it would be worth asking for your attention.
Does anyone have real experience where a lack of lower resolution resources has led to some notable problems?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
This is probably due to the size of the allocated memory for an application with a certain screen size. Using graphics on ldpi from xhdpi is fraught with catching OutOfMemory at 16mb per application. And the load on the system to compress xhdpi images with a ratio of 2.75. It’s good if you only have icons and icons, and some of them have blurry backgrounds and parallaxes, although 9-patch saves here too.
Does anyone have real experience where a lack of lower resolution resources has led to some notable problems?
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question