Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
What is the problem with the windows\linux\cisco link?
The situation is such
an OFFICE and a WAREHOUSE
OFFICE: cisco 2921, 2 providers work, KERIO WAREHOUSE
: cisco 1921 (no shaper)
Recently, on the main channel with a warehouse, the channel fell by exactly half (planned "measurements" by iperf'om).
Here are the measurements on the main provider: (all through iperf) and comparison
Windows SKLAD (server) - windows OFFICE (client) - 8-9mbits / s
Windows SKLAD (client) - windows OFFICE (server) -8-9mbits / s
Windows SKLAD ( server) – centos OFFICE(client) – 17-20mbits/s
Windows SKLAD (client) – centos (server) – 8-9 mbits/s
Centos SKLAD (server) – centos OFFICE (client) 18-19mbits/s
Centos SKLAD ( client) – centos OFFICE (server) 17-19mbits/s
tcpdump outputs on centos: (IPERF)
13: 22: 00.970290 IP 192.168.20.4.40794> 192.168.99.16.commplex-link: flags [.], SEQ 1441816: 1443176, ACK 1, Win 515, Length 1360
Wireshark (Windows)
33 0.122191000 192.168.99.213 TCP 1414 40786 > commplex-link [ACK] Seq=38233 Ack=1 Win=131840 Len=1360
It differs mainly in the size of the transmission window (on windows it is noticeably larger). I don’t understand batch analysis well, that’s why I ask for help, why such a strange channel? centos-machines skip the full channel, and with windows - halved
* antiviruses, firewalls, etc. - disabled
** tried directly through providers (bypassing the office gateway) - the same
*** cisco configs are excellent and worked out over the years
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
the problem was the tcp window size. The increase corrected the situation.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question