Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
What are the most obvious jambs you see in the above layout?
I have a friend who considers himself a god of design.
Showed him a business card, he said that it was complete hell. In this case, there is no argument. I want to understand what is so egregious here?
Layout: https://yadi.sk/i/bATKpTQckruEd
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
In general, the business card meets the level of information content and a certain minimalism. The idea is quite simple, the background is without unnecessary elements, everything is in the same range, white text on a gradient. This is about the idea, but the implementation is not very good, in particular, I can note the selection of fonts, the serif font is striking, it looks terrible here. For maximum results, it is better to choose the font as on the site address under the logo, although it is clear that the email address is typed in the same font, apparently this font did not have Cyrillic (I could be wrong). The background is questionable, and I would correct the position of the elements, indents, font size and logo size. But the main thing is that the business card solves its purpose - it is informative, for some this is enough.
Did the client accept the job? If yes, everything is ok, no, redo it, everything is simple. Everything else is taste.
Because this "business card", whatever one may say, is a solid example of how not to do it. Background - frivolous, logo - kingsize is clearly out of place / out of place, name-position-contacts - the location is inconvenient for perception and fonts ...
I think, before you "design" a business card, you should look at the pictures in Google on request business card design...
From a technical point of view, a business card is really hell. The phones are written differently, the layout sucks, the skittles jump, the fonts are banal. A person with taste immediately smells the curvature of a business card. The picture is ok, but in order to effectively work out the picture on the background - you need to effectively work out the text on it, but this is not the case.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question