Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Universal trading robot. Is it possible to?
Hello!
I'm Vladislav and I'm an alcohol trader. There is a goal to have a trading robot that works independently of the trading platform. I don’t want to write separately for each platform (metatrader, quick, etc.), which is often updated, which is why sometimes you have to make changes to the code.
I am currently trading in Metatrader. I do not use any indicators in trading, only visual (technical) analysis. Ideally, I would like to have a robot that VISUALLY assesses the state of the market (recognition of trend / correction lines) according to my algorithm, and gives orders to trading platforms, in their understandable "language". Is my wish even realizable?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Long wrote the answer and erased.
In short, it is possible, but it is not necessary / does not make sense.
Each bot must be sharpened strictly on one platform
There are enough bots out there. In this area, software has been developed since the beginning of the existence of computers. All platforms are organized only for the inflow of investments into the market (money is not taken by itself) - so that others can earn.
I'll tell you a story. There is a very successful stock player in the USA. Once he spent money and hired a programmer who assembled hardware and wrote software. The essence of software is forecasting. Now they are billionaires. I don't remember his last name, but there are mutual friends. So everything is real. The question of the algorithm, the question of quality code, the right hardware. I will say that the proger had a starting salary of 100k greenbacks per year. Now I can not give an exact figure, but according to rumors for 1M per year.
The essence of success is the combination of a brilliant mathematician and a brilliant programmer + a great idea + having money for the right implementation. Remove something from the scheme and get nonsense that is not worth taking on. So if you have an algorithm and money - go ahead. What is the problem?
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question