SSHFS bypasses Samba, unlike custom sharing for Windows?

Question

System administration

Linux has SSHFS, does it run on SSH protocol? So he doesn't need Samba? And in Windows there is a custom client for connecting to remote files, and it works with port 139, but under what protocol? And are there SSHFS analogues for Windows that work via SSH, bypassing ports and intermediaries like Samba?
And which is better, the built-in Windows remote drive, or software like SSHFS?

Answer 1

SSHFS bypasses Samba

SSHFS has nothing to do with SAMBA and does not depend in any way.

So he doesn't need Samba?

Well, of course.

And in Windows there is a custom client for connecting to remote files, and it works with port 139, but under what protocol?

No one except you can know what kind of custom client you have installed in your version of windows.

And are there SSHFS analogues for Windows that work via SSH, bypassing ports and intermediaries like Samba?

What are the analogues? What exactly do you need? What ports are we talking about?

And which is better, the built-in Windows remote drive, or software like SSHFS?

What is an embedded remote drive, and for what purpose should it be better or worse?

Answer 2

Everything is here https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSHFS