Scaling as a way to test the layout - nonsense?

Question

css

We had a dispute with one friend here .. He claims that it is quite normal and correct to test the layout at different resolutions using the built-in zoom in the browser. Those. for example, it is on the screen at 1920px, just in chrome it scales the site to 50% and says that this is how it should look at a resolution of 960px. I tell him that this is nonsense and to test the site at different resolutions, you need to use the adaptive layout mode in the chrome developer tools, setting your resolution, but the scale should always be 100%. Guess which one of us is right?

Answer 1

Complete nonsense. Scaling is used for other tasks. The simplest test is resizing the browser window. Not a panacea, but in 80%-90% of cases, what will look like this on most devices. For the same percentage of sites, this type of testing pays for itself. I personally use bootstrap. Recently switched to their flex model in version 4. True, I don’t understand in any way whether they are going to make a release at all or it will hang in the form of alpha.

Answer 2

I tell him that this is nonsense and to test the site at different resolutions, you need to use the adaptive layout mode

And you speak right

Answer 3

I'll add here. In general, adaptive layout is just what is needed so that the site on smaller screens does not look like it was just scaled, but more adaptively;)
Ie . not like this
but like this