Recommend a universal CMS

Question

CMS

I know that there are many specialized CMS, there are frameworks and self-written solutions, but nevertheless, the task arose to look for a good universal CMS as a base for most sites.
Habravchane, if you have already encountered such a task, advise options that satisfy my wishes below:
1) Extensibility and modularity
2) Open source (not mandatory GNU \ GPL, you can also pay, but with open source)
3) Security (first of all this implies a timely update of holes, if any)
4) The presence of a convenient admin part (which can be understood not only by an unshaven programmer)
5) Code that fully corresponds to the MVC model
6) Acceptable performance
7) The presence of CCK (Content Construction Kit) (available in the delivery of Drupal and as extensions for Joomla) or its analogue under a different name

Answer 1

I don't know anything better than Drupal.
I would like to say that this is only in PHP, that it is better to go to Python or Ruby, but only there are no normal CMS, only good frameworks.

Answer 2

Drupal only,
1) ok,
2) ok,
3) ok,
4) it's all configurable, you can even do without a single line of code, and configure it through special themes (RootCandy, Polpo Admin Theme) and modules (admin, admin_theme), or you can try yourself and write an excellent admin panel in the form of a module, which many do.
5) almost ok,
6) if you tune well both the server software and Drupal itself, then you can get PROFIT :)
7) ok.

Answer 3

The third point will be given to you only by rating leaders with a large audience. But the "big three" - WordPress, Drupal, Joomla - won't give you all the rest. So - either accept and join one person and endure shortcomings, or take risks and try little-known ones. Or "cycling" - this path is not ordered to any php-shnik :)
By the way, have you looked at MaxSite CMS? They say he's good.

Answer 4

"Universal CMS" is more of an unnecessary dream.
If you study one CMS well enough, then you can do everything (or almost everything) well on it. But this does not mean that it is good for the purposes used. But you have to choose what to delve into in order to spend less time on development.
I use WP myself, but I know people who use Drupal for the same. Joomla IMHO sucks, and everything else is not worth attention. Between Drupal and WP the difference is rather ideological. The first is a rigid framework, "ideologically correct" decisions. The second is the minimum of the required functionality and complete anarchy, with a crazy variety of plugins.
Performance is just a level of understanding of the CMS - you can tune almost any pretty well. But there will never be an ideal CMS, because it contains the redundancy of universality.

Answer 5

And there are "universal machines"? In principle, yes ... for example, the entire Jeneral Purpose line, which in the popular language turned into a Jeep. On it and in the city and on the ground and carry cargo and show-off to catch up ...
If so, then ModX Revo

Answer 6

from the practice of development ...
in most cases I use Drupal, for small sites, mainly wordpress, joomla had to be abandoned, since the price of developing add-ons is higher than customers are willing to pay.
ps: I work mainly in the western market

Answer 7

A universal CMS is any of your favorite frameworks and a couple of days of code :)

Answer 8

I am using Wordpress. It's not just for blogging. His template engine is very flexible, you can mold almost anything. +14k plugins for any occasion. There is a problem with the load, but it is solved by caching and lightweight translation. Although they said correctly above - there is no CMS for all occasions.

Answer 9

October CMS is what you need, especially if you are familiar with laravel. It's not really a CMS, it's a CMF.