D
D
Dmitry2011-12-22 09:16:29
HTML
Dmitry, 2011-12-22 09:16:29

Playing video from the server without the possibility of downloading it

there are mp4 webm files. It is planned to post copies in medium quality on youtube, and on the site in HD. How to organize their viewing on the site, making downloading as difficult as possible? Preferably with an html5 player, for viewing on tablets as well.

Or don’t bother, but put it on youtube immediately in maximum quality - there is a larger audience and there will be additional transitions to the site?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

13 answer(s)
E
Eddy_Em, 2011-12-22
@Eddy_Em

> How to organize their viewing on the site, making downloading as difficult as possible?
Don't try to do it: pointless work.
// but in general, this question reminds: “if I only watch web pages, the traffic doesn’t count, because I don’t download anything?”

D
Dmitry, 2011-12-22
@Tomasina

good idea. It's just that the comments in the video are a little annoying for me personally. Are there many?

C
cjey, 2011-12-22
@cjey

Perhaps it makes sense to post new videos on youtube in maximum quality with a small time delay (1 day for example) and inform about it. Then those who are really interested will come to the site and there will be maximum audience coverage.

D
Dmitry Kuzmin, 2011-12-22
@Dimkaa

Put it on YouTube, and in the video, when playing a link with comments, what you can watch in HD on such and such a site. Whoever wants to, will go, well, the traffic will increase for you on the site.

D
Dmitry Kuzmin, 2011-12-22
@Dimkaa

Make them so that they do not annoy. Strongly did not fall out, did not hang for a long time. It is enough to be noticed and read and you do not need to constantly show them in one video.

S
sergeyvolobuev, 2011-12-22
@sergeyvolobuev

>How to organize their viewing on the site, making downloading as difficult as possible?
I unfortunately forgot what exactly this technology is called, but its whole essence boils down to the fact that the file is given in small pieces to the client, and the client already plays them one by one. In addition to all this, there are a lot of tricks to protect the file, i.e. "broken" pieces are transmitted from time to time, which the player will skip, but if you glue all the pieces together, the file becomes "broken". It seems to be called a streming stream .

A
Alexander, 2011-12-22
@zlobin

post a small piece on YouTube in medium quality, and at the end make captions that you can watch the full video in HD quality on the site. Whoever likes it will go to the site to watch it. But anyway, whoever needs that sopret video and put it in another place

M
Maxim Lapshin, 2011-12-25
@erlyvideo

What's in the question, what's in the comments is a complete mess.
Firstly, "mp4 webm" - what kind of nonsense is this?
Secondly, if the soul asks for "html5 playback" for no reason (and you have no reason), then forget about content security.
Thirdly, only people who are far from servers and the Internet can carry nonsense about the load on chunk streaming.
Fourth, you need HDS + HLS, i.e. iOS + Flash. While you are raving about the ideas of "html5 video" any student will come and download.

E
Evgeny Bezymyannikov, 2011-12-22
@psman

I read everything and still do not understand what youtube has to do with it. You can save videos from it without problems.
In general, any content that is issued by the server can be saved. From the browser cache, on the local proxy, plug-ins, stupidly "save as".
The same failed idea as “how to protect the text on the site from theft”.
There is no protection.

B
Boris Syomov, 2011-12-22
@kotomyava

If you're giving away the video at all for the user to watch, you're giving it away. How not to cheat, you can always save it, at least it’s trite in the output. If you still want to be able to watch it on tablets without additional software, from the page, then you won’t be able to cheat too much.
They are protected from placing the video on third-party resources, and not from the ability of the user to save it.
Where it is better to place depends on a large number of factors. In particular, to show video to a large audience, you need a wide channel and fast storage, which costs a lot. 1 stream of hd video, these are units (~ 2) Mbps. Well, of course, on why and in what context you show it.

D
Dmitry, 2011-12-22
@Tomasina

protection is needed rather not so much from downloading, but from placement on other resources, with cropped watermarks.

V
Vladislav Ross, 2011-12-23
@gag_fenix

In the end, you can always just grab the video from the screen, so it's all useless.

J
jov, 2011-12-25
@jov

Surprisingly, there is not a word about rtmp in the answers. I’ll make a reservation right away, of course you can download it, but this will already be a very difficult task for an “abstract housewife”.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question