V
V
ValdikSS2010-11-26 17:59:42
linux
ValdikSS, 2010-11-26 17:59:42

Overhead ext3/4?

I searched for a long time on the Internet, and I can not find anything intelligible.
I bought a 1.5 TB hard drive, formatted it in ext4, and ext4 with default settings ate 26 (!) GB. I know about reserving 5% of the space, I turned it off. Empirically, it was found that just a huge number of inodes were created. Formatted with -N 1000000.
Questions:
1) Did I do the right thing?
2) Why is there such a big overhead by default?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

2 answer(s)
S
segoon, 2010-11-27
@segoon

  1. 2 percent overhead is not so much, it will be worse if you have a lot of free space and no inodes :)
  2. The ext4 architecture is outdated long ago, XFS fans constantly criticize ext4 for static inode placement.

ext4 has two advantages:
  1. it is relatively simple
  2. compatible (if desired, backwards compatible) with ext3

If you miss its features - welcome to XFS and Co.

D
dgeliko, 2010-11-26
@dgeliko

There was not enough topic on lore? =)

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question