Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Mistake in description of rational expressions in math textbook?
In the book "The Big Handbook of Mathematics" ed. Scanavi in the chapter on identical transformations has the following list of algebraic expressions:
It is said that the first and second are rational.
The third and fourth are not. With the latter, everything is clear (there is a variable under the radical sign). And why is number 3 not a rational algebraic expression?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question