Minimum linux distribution for using office and skype?

Question

linux

There is an old laptop, which is in excellent condition and has an excellent battery, in general there is no desire to throw it away or sell it), I decided to find the most 'simple' linux-like OS for it to use skype, office, and web surfing.

Answer 1

Any. Even modern KDE will consume less resources than Skype.
So my vote is for Kubuntu 18.04.

Answer 2

From personal experience I can recommend
Xubuntu
.

Answer 3

Personally from my experience. Laptop Intel atom. 1 GB RAM. None of the Linux distributions have worked well. The choice fell on Windows XP sp3. And a custom mozilla browser. Even vidos in 720p loses without problems. Youtube too. Skype is working. And there are drivers.

Answer 4

I can recommend CrunchBangPlusPlus (Debian based, window manager - Openbox) or Puppy Linux (shell made from JWM / IceWM + ROX DesktopJWM / IceWM + ROX Desktop, not based on any other Linux distribution)

Answer 5

I would advise Arch (yes, I want to drag you into our sect) and a properly configured DE.
Even sneakers (KDE) will do, plasma is now no heavier than a rat (XFCE) or you can spend time and assemble lightweight DE piece by piece on i3 (tiled wm).
If you want something lightweight and customizable but Arch is too complicated/long, I recommend looking at other Arch-based distributions BUT NOT Manjaro as suggested above.
Why not? Here's why: https://manjaro.auteiy.me/

Answer 6

My choice is MX Linux. Runs on a virtual machine with one processor core and a gig of RAM.

Answer 7

Mx linux definitely. Or antix based on mx. The most common and popular at the moment. A big plus is that it is still being produced and supported in 32-bit. With all modern software! A 64-bit distribution on old hardware does not need to be installed. I installed mx on a 2007 laptop with a 32-bit intel centrino processor and 1 GB of memory. Works great. Hd-Video files are pulled without lags with a resolution of 1280 * 720 and up to 3 GB in size. Lags come out on fullhd files with a resolution of 1920 * 1080 and a size of more than 3 GB. I think that the problem is in the hardware, not in the system. Monitor on laptop 1280*800.
Winxp is not recommended. The software is no longer supported. First of all, browsers. Windows definitely needs all the updates. You hesitate to bet. You definitely need an antivirus so that any evil spirits do not climb through known, but not closed holes. Antiviruses now eat up from 500 MB of memory. You are tormented to look for fast and low-eating. And you will still be dissatisfied with the speed.

Answer 8

The concept of "old" is different for everyone. Specify - is it old on intel i3-2310, on atom d525, or really ancient with 64MB of RAM, on which win98 was?
If there is a couple of gigs of RAM and at least 2 cores (or HT). that in principle - any Linux. I installed Mageia 2 on KDE on my computer somewhere in 2008-2010, and it flew very fast (2 cores, 2 gigs). But then I also installed Mageia 7 - it's also normal, both on the new and on the old computer.
Of the very fast ones - Puppy, and some others (I forgot already), and even Linux Mint is quite good (although they often criticize, because there are also enough bugs).

Answer 9

I would suggest Manjaro/Fedora + i3

Answer 10

There is a lightweight distribution based on Ubuntu specifically for this called lubuntu. For such purposes, it should fit perfectly under this and sharpened

Answer 11

Win XP by Zab :)
Yes, new browsers are no longer supported, but the system flies.
Net eats after starting only <50MB of RAM.
A little more is possible with video drivers.

Answer 12

I love linux mint, it’s beautiful, fast, but it’s a little more difficult for a laptop than win 10, so even if wine 10 doesn’t work, it’s better to install xubuntu, the version is 16.04, others are heavier, mx is also not bad