Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Long or short URL, abbreviated or not?
Greetings
I thought about the "beauty" of the URL's brevity - is it necessary or not?
Now the URL looks like this:
site.ru/slesarnyij-remont/podveska/zamena-podveski/zamena-amortizatorov/zamena-pylnika-amortizatora/zamena-pylnika-perednego-amortizatora/
(по русски)
site.ru/remont/podveska/zamena/amortizator/pylnik/perednij-pylnik/
(по английски, хз как пыльник перевести))
site.ru/repair/suspension/replace/absorber/pylnik/perednij-pylnik/
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Nothing will change, and I like your long urls even more, as they make it clear exactly where I will get by clicking on the link.
For ranking, this does not affect in any way, but according to Muller (Google employee), if Google finds 2 pages with the same content, then the one with the link length will be in the issue. It is she who will be considered canonical, unless the opposite is directly indicated inside the page code.
+ they are not always placed in the visible part of the address bar of the browser, which negatively affects the user factor.
Your link has 131 characters, and according to statistics from other sites in the issuance of Google pot 10 top 100 sites have an average of 35-40 characters.
+ even Google itself came up with link shorteners, and for the convenience of distributing links in social networks and everything else that affects the human factor.
+ in your link there are 3 identical keys "Armorizer replacement"
The lower the nesting level, the better. The shorter (while still making sense, of course) the URL, the better.
You have several almost identical categories with the same keys, which is not good.
Plus, the chance that the search robot will go beyond the third or fourth level is not so great.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question