Linux for the office?

Question

linux

Greetings,
which distribution kit is most suitable for the office today (apparently ubuntu-based, xfce is desirable so that it does not load)?
So that the 1C8 client (thin and thick), RDP, TeamViewer, Samba, support for printers, MFPs, etc. work without shamanism.
Mint Xfce or maybe some more ready-made type of Runtu?
Thanks to.

Answer 1

Anyone that you know very well, because all the "wants" you expressed suggest that such a layer of work is not bad.
Well, get ready for a war with users.
UPD.
Get ready to buy network printers, and in general just buy network printers :)

Answer 2

mint

Answer 3

Buy Windows and do not suffer, you will spend more time to bring everything to a more or less working state than the cost of licenses. If you need rdp support, then you already have a Windows server, CAL licenses will still be needed regardless of a windows or linux client. In 15 years of my experience, only one company tried to "switch" to Linux, it took less than a month, because the staff had 100,500 questions "how can I do it now ...". And new people came and they had to be trained, anew. And the worst thing is libreoffice, users are already accustomed to office 2007 and older, but in fact returned to the office 2003 interface, many did not even see it, so performance dropped significantly, and the number of questions increased. Labor costs for user training, support and integration of this all exceed the cost of licenses,

Answer 4

Install and check. Linux on a workstation is always a lottery.

Answer 5

Somehow I switched the office to mint, there was enough crap with printers, but after setting it up with pens, everything has been working for a couple of years

Answer 6

ubuntu interface mate behind the eyes

Answer 7

I can not agree with those who advise: "for ordinary users, buy Windows and office". It sounds like: "buy and then pay every year to save the admin on time and nerves." The office will pay, the admin will save. And in fact, it will still run and clean something there, rearrange it, roll it up.
We have many years of Voyager OS for beauty. The same Ubuntu with goodies. I don't remember any problems. Users, even if they are not happy, do not say anything, because everything just works.

Answer 8

Any one you know. I don’t know how about the 1C take-off speed, but raise xfreerdp with a server (but do you need a server - so that they cling to it ?) And samba - you won’t get off with tomatoes, and if the printers are not networked, then you’ll generally have to smoke mana on CUPS.

Answer 9

and what prevents you from looking at the list of distributions supported by the same 1C?
and in the rest, choose the one that is next to the guru, or the one for which the community is the most (now the most popular are ubunta, kubut, mint ... it’s easiest to find support for them. we put them on our desktops, and we put them on the servers I appreciate it simply because the younger brother is the twin of redhat, and redhat is tied to a lot of all sorts of corporate-interprayhny. )

Answer 10

IMHO for ordinary users to buy Windows and office. In general, any standard ubuntu will do, but its study and possible bugs, user jambs can be more expensive.
A year of license for wine + office will cost 10k rubles.
Now calculate how much an employee’s hour of work costs, estimate how many hours per year can be lost due to employee problems, and consider how much productivity of this employee can generally decrease - if even by 5%, then without plugs - this is 5% of this employee’s salary for year. And the equilibrium white salary will be only 200k per year. And this is 17k per month or 13k of the salary indicated in the TD. Are you getting less? And for this money, you will not find an experienced user who will quickly get used to the new OS.
IMHO, this option should be considered only for highly linear employees who sit all the time in one program, for example, score accounts in 1s. And even for them it will be a problem sometimes - sometimes the printer will turn off, then the account in the libreoffice will not be displayed that way.
Another thing is if there are significant technological barriers to the use of Windows - which in itself is a unique case for employees of this level. And this is clearly not your case, since the entire set of software that you voiced works much easier and more reliably on Windows. At least in my experience

Answer 11

For example, we have the main axis at the Centos7 studio.

Answer 12

A similar question was asked, maybe it will help you?