Licensing windows server what to buy?

Question

Windows Server

Good afternoon, new job, new task, the authorities requested to assemble a server for the following needs, users will go to it via RDP, work there a little bit (mail and a bit of surfing), as well as stick ms sql on it and transport several small 1c databases (3 pieces are all up to 3 GB in size), on the one hand there are no problems, we buy hardware, assemble it, install the system, throw in roles and let's go.
There is a problem on the other hand, the authorities want everything to be as it is, licensed, real, white and fluffy, and then my hair, an old filibuster, began to stir, I understand correctly that for all this you need to buy: win server itself ( std - about 75 thousand rubles), buy an rdp server role for it (6-10 thousand for 50 users), buy an MS-SQL server (another 75 thousand rubles) and already to it - a CAL license for each sql user (200 dollars each for everyone, for everyone who will use 1c)? Or I do not take into account what else and for the win server itself, you also need to buy cal licenses for each user (also because of the evergreens on the snout)? What is the optimal set of purchases for this kind of server from white people? all this is natural 2019 win server

Answer 1

1. Server Windows, minimum set of 2x8 packages per core.
2. Terminal licenses by the number of users (or devices) that will go to the server.
3. Device license (DeviceCAL), which is required to work on a network with a domain.
4. MS Office licenses, if users in the terminal window will work with office documents, then the number of licenses is equal to the number of users.
5. License for the sequel server.
6. License to connect to the sequel server by cores (or by users).
7. Server license 1C
8. Client licenses 1C

Answer 2

mail and a bit of surfing

Are you sure you need a windows server for this?
you count, count, and then try to calculate (only in more detail than the phrase 'a bit') how much linux-based solutions will cost (in man-hours) and you will most likely like it, and some inconvenience for users can be leveled by the phrase, no question - we subtract the cost of implementing windows solutions from sn.
ps microsoft has solutions with
pps rental licenses heterogeneous environments are a great way to solve a bunch of problems. those tasks for which linux is not suitable can be solved on windows.