Job classification?

Question

IT education

If we accept as a fact that in most cases a job change is just a fiction, and only a small part changes, then how can these areas be classified.
as I see it
1. selling
the essence is to sell something to people
2. creative
essence no matter in what area the general one needs to generate something new.
3. synthetic creative
essence the application of knowledge to obtain a predetermined result (here is automation / improvement of an existing one)
4. execution according to a model / template of work that is simply unprofitable / unnecessary to automate
5 work that is either impossible or has not yet been automated
6. management
the essence is to make sure that the tools work correctly
, I’m not sure about point 6, as it seems to be something between the second and third and multiplied by “experience”,
help me to supplement / correct, I will be glad if you write “works” that do not obey this classification,
the essence of this classification: everything must obey a simple rule,
if a person is developed in one of the categories, then without breaking himself he can go to work for another job in the same category
********************** ******************************************************* ********
upd
laying all the cards on the table.
this idea appeared after
1.Requirements: "higher education"
no matter what direction, what specialty, you need stupidly printed paper
in which it doesn’t matter what year of graduation, no matter what educational institution,
where the freshness of the knowledge being taught is not important, where it doesn’t matter what level of knowledge you left ...
at work where it doesn’t matter if you have all the tower or not.
2. Full-time training in sharaga for jobs related to 4-5 points = 3-4-5 years part-time
(retraining "adults") for the same jobs 2-10 weeks.
3. If Candidates Without a Tower can also do the same job as candidates with a Tower, then
Tower is a criterion, if it is, then only as point 1.
4. If "Vanya", a sales consultant, does not need to graduate from law in order to also cope well with the work of a secretary
(pc \ planktnon operator) then somewhere there is obviously a (deception) balovo
If you were then sold as a tour operator and then wanted to become a web programmer and you succeeded
even with the lack of a tower and experience in these areas, then ... in these "works" there must be a common denominator that
allows, without "labor / fractures / development of new qualities, to simply stupidly gain knowledge for the area and spin in it,
giving out results better than those who are "according to
Feng Shui" then ... the
dissatisfied will scream
(YOU FUCKED 5 years studying, and this unwashed one crawled out of nowhere, according to his status he is not supposed to be such a seller)
then... having spent a week or two, on a set of knowledge necessary for this area, he will pack everyone with elite products.
6. If a person "lives" in the short term and evaluates all\all\himself only in this perspective
, then he will always have "those who can (talented)" earn more\live better\be more beautiful\smarter.
but, in the long run, talent is nothing (a small bonus, no more)
and in the long run, a number of simple rules apply (wooden ass, wooden head, and 10k hours)
that make you look at everything differently.
vooooot)
as described in paragraph 4, everyone does it, but only to the extent of their confidence and impudence.
because there is NO thing that can really become a REAL reason for the ban
Except for the FAILED/CONFIGURED reasons.
we just all agreed together that the change is "difficult" that the change can only be when
, out of desperation, I am forced to change work / sphere / direction.
(that society needs reliable gears for a maximum service life.)
It is not beneficial for the mechanism that there are many such "very smart" ones and that there are many "universal" ones,
which is why there is such a gigantic division into an infinite number of various works (extras)
but they all have common denominators , an example of an "engineer" of subclasses is a lot, but the essence is the same.
a simpler and dumber example, repair (san \ electric \ stone \ builds \ plaster \ painter) in general, everyone who is involved in the repair
there ninada to study for 5 years gaining fundamental / basic knowledge, there each direction is 1-2 weeks.
(I don’t argue there are a lot of subtleties in every area / every business)
BUT you can be able to do everything, or you can not be able to, but just come from a hillock and immediately be accepted as a “strong junior”
without knowing anything but having a developed common denominator.
in mental work, the same principle is only the input threshold is higher / wider / larger.
keeping all this in mind, a funny classification emerges that cannot exceed
8 points (MB later I will add the rest)
essence.
and looking at all this through the "long-term perspective"
there is no longer a desire to go "work to work"
you definitely won't go to work "by distribution"
they don’t scare stories anymore (they saved them)
they don’t scare anymore (chrysis)
they don’t scare anymore (it’s good to go)
they don’t scare anymore (I can’t do anything except ***)
key schemes that open dozens of doors are already in my hands, you just need to carve them.

Answer 1

Down with your classification.
The same salespeople can be both insanely creative, and completely boring, and working in a pattern.

Answer 2

he can go to work for another job in the same category without breaking himself

As for this, it is necessary to classify not according to areas, but deeper - according to the mindset, the type of thinking, or something.
Let me give you an example, one and the same area is programming, many people think that any programmer needs and needs only a "mathematical" (synthetic, "inventive") mindset, but this has long been not entirely true, in programming activities can be synthetic (development of algorithms , matan), and sometimes analytical (studying what is already ready, including reverse engineering), someone is better given one thing, someone else.
And sales, what sales are, you need to know the psychology there, after all, this is an analytical ("research") activity, since we do not create, but study ...
And so on, for the rest of the points.

Answer 3

Damn, well, at least give some criticism.

Answer 4

The breaking of oneself does not depend either on these categories or on the degree of development in them. A fracture of oneself occurs when a person begins to do something that does not correspond to his aspirations and abilities (this is called a vocation). Most people break down at school. Some are broken by their parents, choosing a university and a specialty for them. Some of those who survived are finished off by some employers, putting on them all the work that there is no one to do. As a result, we have millions doing their own thing, doing it poorly, hating Mondays. But still there are those who made their way, groped for "their own". Their eyes burn and their hands itch.
Sometimes "wakes up" "broken". And then, he can score on "what category he is developed in." He can start from scratch and develop even better.

Answer 5

I don't understand what the fuss is about. On the sites there are a lot of opportunities to find a job according to your abilities and the level of payment you need, here are a lot of such vacancies https://careerist.ru/ I’m sure that you don’t have to break yourself or something